You are not logged in. Press here to login.

Content

List volumes - List articles in this issue

Original report

Validation of a questionnaire to detect kinesiophobia (fear of movement) in patients with coronary artery disease

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0942

Open access

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity and reliability of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Heart (TSK-SV Heart), a brief questionnaire to detect kinesiophobia (fear of movement) in patients with coronary artery disease.
DESIGN: Methodological research (cross-sectional study).
SUBJECTS: A total of 332 patients, mean age 65 years (standard deviation 9.1) diagnosed with coronary artery disease at a university hospital were included in the study.
METHODS: The psychometric properties of the TSK-SV Heart were tested. The tests of validity comprised face, content, and construct validity. The reliability tests included composite reliability, internal consistency and stability over time.
RESULTS: In terms of reliability, the TSK-SV Heart was found to be stable over time (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.83) and internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha 0.78). Confirmatory factor analysis provided acceptable fit for a hypothesized 4-factor model with inclusion of a method factor.
CONCLUSION: These results provide support for the reliability of the TSK-SV Heart. The questionnaire appears to be valid for use in patients with coronary artery disease. However, some items require further investigation due to low influence on some sub-dimensions of the test. The sub-dimensions of kinesiophobia require future research concerning their implications for the target group.

Authors:

Maria Bäck, Bengt Jansson, Åsa Cider, Johan Herlitz, Mari Lundberg

References

  1. Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, Jolliffe J, Noorani H, Rees K, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med 2004; 116: 682–692.
  2. Clark AM, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, McAlister FA. Meta-analysis: secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 659–672.
  3. Beswick AD, Rees K, West RR, Taylor FC, Burke M, Griebsch I, et al. Improving uptake and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation: literature review. J Adv Nurs 2005; 49: 538–555.
  4. Philips H. Avoidance behaviour and its role in sustaining chronic pain. Behav Res Ther 1987; 25: 273–279.
  5. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995; 62: 363–372.
  6. Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Management 1990; 3: 35–43.
  7. Buer N, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing: occurrence and risk factor in back pain and ADL in the general population. Pain 2002; 99: 485–491.
  8. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 2000; 85: 317–332.
  9. van Ittersum M, de Greef M, van Gelder I, Coster J, Brugemann J, van der Schans C. Fear of exercise and health-related quality of life in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Int J Rehabil Res 2003; 26: 117–122.
  10. Lundberg M, Grimby-Ekman A, Verbunt J, Simmonds MJ. Pain-related fear: a critical review of the related measures. Pain Res Treat 2011:494196 [Epub ahead of print].
  11. Vlaeyen J. The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. J Occup Rehab 1995; 5: 235–252.
  12. Lundberg M, Styf J, Carlsson S. A psychometric evaluation of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-from a physiotherapeutic perspective. Physiother Theory Pract 2004; 20: 121–133.
  13. First MB, Tasman A. DSM-IV-TR mental disorders: diagnosis, etiology and treatment. Chichester: Wiley; 2004.
  14. Cider A, Carlsson S, Arvidsson C, Andersson B, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K. Reliability of clinical muscular endurance tests in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2006; 5: 122–126.
  15. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1381–1395.
  16. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000; 25: 3130–3139.
  17. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–370.
  18. Roelofs J, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH, Goossens M, Thibault P, Boersma K, et al. Fear of movement and (re)injury in chronic musculoskeletal pain: evidence for an invariant two-factor model of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia across pain diagnoses and Dutch, Swedish, and Canadian samples. Pain 2007; 131: 181–190.
  19. Woby SR, Roach NK, Urmston M, Watson PJ. Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Pain 2005; 117: 137–144.
  20. Cudeck R, O’Dell LL. Applications of standard error estimates in unrestricted factor analysis: significance tests for factor loadings and correlations. Psychol Bull 1994; 115: 475–487.
  21. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criterion for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 1999; 6: 1–55.
  22. Rensvold RB, Cheung GW. Identification of influental cases in structural equation models using the jackknife method. Organizat Res Methods 1999; 2: 293–308.
  23. Raykov T, Shrout P. Reliability of scales with general structure: point and interval estimation using a structural equation modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling 2002; 9: 195–212.
  24. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of a test. Psychometrica 1951; 16: 297–334.
  25. Spector PE. Summated rating scale construction : an introduction. Newbury Park: Sage; 1992.
  26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.
  27. Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research. 2nd ed. New Jersey, Prentice Hall; 2000.
  28. Swinkels-Meewisse IE, Roelofs J, Verbeek AL, Oostendorp RA, Vlaeyen JW. Fear of movement/(re)injury, disability and participation in acute low back pain. Pain 2003; 105: 371–379.
  29. Marks IM. Fears, phobias, and rituals: panic, anxiety, and their disorders. New York: Oxford Univeristy Press; 1987.

    Appendix I. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Heart

    1.

    I am afraid that I might injure myself during physical activity/exercising.

    2.

    If I tried to be physically active/exercise my heart problem would increase.

    3.

    My body is telling me that I have something seriously wrong.

    4.

    My heart problem would probably be relieved if I was physically active/exercised.

    5.

    People are not taking my medical condition seriously enough.

    6.

    My heart problem has weakened me physically for the rest of my life.

    7.

    In general, heart problem is always due to body injury.

    8.

    Just because something causes discomfort in my chest does not mean that it is dangerous.

    9.

    I am afraid that I might injure myself accidentally.

    10.

    By being careful with unnecessary movements I can prevent my heart problems from worsening.

    11.

    I would not have my heart problems if there was not something dangerous going on in my body.

    12.

    Even if I have a heart problem I would manage better if I was physically active/exercised.

    13.

    My heart problem tells me when I should stop being physically active/exercising, so that I do not injure myself.

    14.

    It is really not safe for a person in my condition to be physically active/exercise.

    15.

    I cannot do the same things as others because there is a too big risk that I will get heart problems.

    16.

    Even though something causes me a lot of heart problems, I do not think it is actually dangerous.

    17

    No one should have to be physically active/exercise when he/she has heart problems.



Related articles

There are no related articles.


Actions


Abstract

Full text

PDF

Supplementary


There is no supplementary for this article.

Related articles


Click here to show related articles

Print information


Volume 44, Issue 4

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0942

Pages: 363-369

View at PubMed