You are not logged in. Press here to login.

Content

List volumes - List articles in this issue

Short communication

A comparison of neural mechanisms in mirror therapy and movement observation therapy

doi: 10.2340/16501977-1127

Open access

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To compare lateralized cerebral activations elicited during self-initiated movement mirroring and observation of movements.
SUBJECTS: A total of 15 right-handed healthy subjects, age range 22–56 years.
METHODS: Functional imaging study comparing movement mirroring with movement observation, in both hands, in an otherwise identical setting. Imaging data were analysed using statistical parametric mapping software, with significance threshold set at p < 0.01 (false discovery rate) and a minimum cluster size of 20 voxels.
RESULTS: Movement mirroring induced additional activation in primary and higher-order visual areas strictly contralateral to the limb seen by the subject. There was no significant difference of brain activity when comparing movement observation of somebody else’s right hand with left hand.
CONCLUSION: Lateralized cerebral activations are elicited by inversion of visual feedback (movement mirroring), but not by movement observation.

Authors:

Jing Wang, Claire Fritzsch, Johannes Bernarding , Susanne Holtze, Karl-Heinz Mauritz, Maddalena Brunetti, Christian Dohle
Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

References

1. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S. Touching the phantom limb. Nature 1995; 377: 489–490.

2. Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, Foster C, Galasko D, Llewellyn DM, et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet 1999; 353: 2035–2036.

3. Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Behrens J, Dohle C. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 3: CD008449.

4. Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Pain 2004; 108: 192–198.

5. Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, Dettmers C, McNamara A, Binkofski F, et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage 2007; 36 Suppl 2: T164–T173.

6. Buccino G, Gatti R, Giusti MC, Negrotti A, Rossi A, Calzetti S, et al. Action observation treatment improves autonomy in daily activities in parkinson’s disease patients: results from a pilot study. Mov Disord 2011; 26: 1963–1964.

7. Grezes J, Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 2001; 12: 1–19.

8. Dohle C, Kleiser R, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ. Body scheme gates visual processing. J Neurophysiol 2004; 91: 2376–2379.

9. Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 1995; 73: 2608–2611.

10. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 2001; 13: 400–404.

11. Cabinio M, Blasi V, Borroni P, Montagna M, Iadanza A, Falini A, et al. The shape of motor resonance: right- or left-handed? Neuroimage 2010; 51: 313–323.

12. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 97–113.

13. Matthys K, Smits M, Van der Geest JN, Van der Lugt A, Seurinck R, Stam HJ, et al. Mirror-induced visual illusion of hand movements: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 675–681.

14. Dohle C, Stephan KM, Valvoda JT, Hosseiny O, Tellmann L, Kuhlen T, et al. Representation of virtual arm movements in precuneus. Exp Brain Res 2011; 208: 543–555.

15. Hamzei F, Dettmers C, Rijntjes M, Glauche V, Kiebel S, Weber B, et al. Visuomotor control within a distributed parieto-frontal network. Exp Brain Res 2002; 146: 273–281.

16. Aziz-Zadeh L, Koski L, Zaidel E, Mazziotta J, Iacoboni M. Lateralization of the human mirror neuron system. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 2964–2970.

17. Farrer C, Franck N, Georgieff N, Frith CD, Decety J, Jeannerod M. Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage 2003; 18: 324–333.

18. Cadieux ML, Whitworth K, Shore DI. Rubber hands do not cross the midline. Neurosci Lett 2011; 504: 191–194.

19. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, Sutbeyaz S, Bussmann JB, Koseoglu F, et al. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 393–398.

20. Grefkes C, Nowak DA, Wang LE, Dafotakis M, Eickhoff SB, Fink GR. Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 2010; 50: 233–242.

21. Dohle C, Pullen J, Nakaten A, Kust J, Rietz C, Karbe H. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 209–217.



Related articles

There are no related articles.


Actions


Abstract

Full text

PDF

Supplementary


Table SI

Related articles


Click here to show related articles

Print information


Volume 45, Issue 4

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1127

Pages: 410-413

View at PubMed