Content » Vol 95, Issue 2

Short communication

Zosteriform Metastases of Eccrine Porocarcinoma Mimicking Eruptive Seborrhoeic Keratoses

Nina S. Müller#, Carolin Zschoche#, Wolfgang Hartschuh and Anke S. Lonsdorf

Department of Dermatology, University of Heidelberg, DE-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail: anke.lonsdorf@med.uni-heidelberg.de

#These authors contributed equally and should be considered as first authors.

Accepted Jun 3, 2014; Epub ahead of print Jun 5, 2014

Eccrine porocarcinoma is a rare malignant tumour originating in the eccrine sweat gland acrosyringium. Clinical and histomorphological overlap between a wide range of benign and malignant cutaneous neoplasms, including primary adnexal tumours, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), cutaneous metastases and rarely seborrhoeic keratosis (SK), pose diagnostic challenges. We report on a unique case of cutaneous metastases of eccrine porocarcinoma clinically presenting with a zoster-like, clustered pattern of brownish, hyperkeratotic, confluent papules and plaques clinically mimicking eruptive SK.

CASE REPORT

A 79-year-old woman presented to our department with a zoster-like, clustered pattern of brownish, hyperkeratotic, confluent papules and plaques over her right back, adjacent to a tender 5 cm scar (Fig. 1a). She first recognised lesions 6 months ago which thereafter rapidly increased in numbers. Further clinical examination revealed a palpable suspicious lymph node in the right axilla. The patient had a history of colorectal cancer that had been excised completely in 2000. The scar on her back was reported to result from the histologically incomplete excision of a highly differentiated cutaneous SCC in 2004. A recommended re-excision had not been performed. In 2009 a lymph node metastasis of a moderately differentiated uncornified SCC in the right axilla had been surgically removed. No further treatment or appropriate oncological aftercare had been administered.

A recent biopsy of the current lesions on the patient’s back performed at another institution classified the tumours as epidermotropic metastases of an adenocarcinoma, histologically presenting as superficial porocarcinoma. Differential diagnosis of metastases of the former rectal carcinoma was dismissed with all relevant immunohistochemical markers being negative (CDX2, PAX 2, PAX 8, Cytokeratin 7, Cytokeratin 20).

Histopathological examination of another skin biopsy at our department revealed typical epidermal characteristics of SK such as papillomatosis, acanthosis and hyperkeratosis with pseudocornoid cysts. Widespread nests of pleomorphic epithelial cells with partially vacuolated cytoplasm and focal acantholysis as well as multiple atypical mitoses were found in the epidermis and predominantly subepidermal layers. Deeper dermal layers revealed separated cell clusters, partly within dilated lymphatic vessels (Fig. S11). Immunhistochemistry showed strong expression of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) but not carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Concomitant histopathological reevaluation of the skin biopsy in 2004 revealed similar poroid, pleomorphic cell formations, comparable to our current findings and consistent with primary porocarcinoma. Based on our dermatopathological examination and the clinical history we diagnosed epidermotropic metastases of a porocarcinoma not fully excised in 2004, clinical presenting as SK in a zosteriform arrangement.

To evaluate local tumour spread 11 mapping biopsies were performed, 9 of them revealing tumour infiltration. Additional circular mapping biopsies in more peripheral clinically healthy-appearing skin regions revealed further singular nests of tumour cells in subepidermal lymphatic vessels in 2 biopsy specimens (Fig. 1b).

Due to widespread local tumour infiltration a complete surgical curative therapy was disregarded. CT and MRI scans of the patient revealed lymph node metastasis in the right axilla and no evidence of further organ involvement or primary visceral origin. Pursuant to the recommendations of an interdisciplinary tumour-board at our skin cancer centre fractional radiation therapy (total-dose 54 Gy) of the right axilla and the dorsal thoracic region was conducted, followed by a sequential boost of the thoracic region with 12 Gy. Subsequent staging showed regression of the lymph node- and skin-metastases. Adjuvant therapy with cetuximab was discussed but declined by the patient.

4208fig1.tif

Fig. 1. Multiple brownish, hyperkeratotic papules coalesce in a zosteriform pattern to form plaques with ill-defined margins on the right back (a). Nearby, on the right flank a bright 5 cm long scar is visible (arrow). Mapping-biopsies taken on clinically unaffected skin (b). Singular nests of tumour cells were detected in subepidermal lymphatic vessels in specimen 2 and 8.

DISCUSSION

Eccrine porocarcinoma was first described by Pinkus & Mehregan in 1963 (1). It represents between 0.005 and 0.01% of all skin tumours (2). It may invade the papillary dermis and dermal lymphatics, spread within them, and then reinvade the epidermis, giving rise to cutaneous metastases (3). This invasion pattern may explain the propensity for local recurrences (20%) and lymph node or organ metastasis (10%). This malignancy most commonly affects patients over 50 years without gender preference (4). The clinical appearance of porocarcinoma is remarkably variable with differentials including SK, pyogenic granuloma, melanoma, SCC and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (5).

In most cases porocarcinoma is a histological rather than a clinical diagnosis. Current immune histological markers reported to be helpful include CEA and EMA as the most sensitive ones and cytokeratin 19 as the most specific one (6). Differentiation of squamous variants of eccrine porocarcinoma from SCC is particularly challenging (7), but essential because porocarcinomas have a greater propensity for developing lymph node metastases and a poorer survival (4, 6). Lymphatic metastasis occurs in 10–20% of cases regardless of the tumour thickness (3, 6). While visceral metastases are rare, the case facility rate in patients with lymph node metastases is approximately 67% (8). There is no established standard for therapy of porocarcinoma, especially in cases of metastasis. With a local recurrence rate of 20% (3) micrographic excision is the widely accepted treatment modality (5). Additionally, lymph node clearance should be performed if regional lymph nodes are involved (5). The response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (e.g. MTX, Bleomycin, Cisplatin) and other drugs (e.g. interferon-alpha, isotretinoin) seems to be low (1).

It has been suggested that porocarcinoma may arise from benign eccrine poroma (4). However in the largest series of 69 patients this was reported in only 18% of cases (4). Our case highlights the diagnostic challenges associated with this rare tumour and reveals several extraordinary features. To the best of our knowledge this is the first reported case with a zosteriform, verrucous growth pattern of epidermotropic metastases of eccrine porocarcinoma. This metastatic pattern has only been reported sporadically in adenocarcinoma of the ovary (9) and a few other cancers (10). Zosteriform dissemination has been attributed to direct lymphatic infiltration of cancer cells (9, 11), which also was observed in our case.

Another unusual aspect of the present case are the epidermal structures within the epidermotropic metastases, which are clinically and histologically indistinguishable from SK.

Although the association between SK and malignant skin tumours within one lesion has been sporadically reported since 1932 (12), this is generally considered a rare combination. Most tumours reported to occur within SK are known to be BCCs (13).

To the best of our knowledge, there are only 3 previously reported cases of eccrine porocarcinoma arising on an SK. One occurred synchronously with Bowen’s disease, forming a single lesion on a preexisting SK of the abdomen (12). In the 2 other reported cases eccrine porocarcinoma arose within a preexisting SK on the abdomen (14). In our patient, a reverse mechanism may be suspected since seborrheic lesions coincided with the epidermotropic metastasis of an eccrine porocarcinoma in the absence of preexisting SK in the tumour area. Altered expression of several proteins associated with cell-cycle regulation and cell-proliferation have been reported in SK (15) and such altered patterns of expression have been related to the occurrence of malignant tumours in SK lesions.

9232.png

1http://www.medicaljournals.se/acta/content/?doi=10.2340/00015555-1902

REFERENCES

1. Pinkus H, Mehregan AH. Epidermotropic eccrine carcinoma. A case combining features of eccrine poroma and Paget’s dermatosis. Arch Dermatol 1963; 88: 597–606.

2. Mehregan AH, Hashimoto K, Rahbari H. Eccrine adenocarcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Arch Dermatol 1983; 119: 104–114.

3. De Giorgi V, Sestini S, Massi D, Papi F, Lotti T. Eccrine porocarcinoma: a rare but sometimes fatal malignant neo­plasm. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33: 374–377.

4. Robson A, Greene J, Ansari N, Kim B, Seed PT, McKee PH, Calonje E. Eccrine porocarcinoma (malignant eccrine poroma): a clinicopathologic study of 69 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25: 710–720.

5. Permi HS, Bhat SP, Kishan Prasad HL, Bhat VS. Eccrine porocarcinoma of scalp: an uncommon tumor at an unusual site. Indian J Surg Oncol 2011; 2: 145–147.

6. Mahalingam M, Richards JE, Selim MA, Muzikansky A, Hoang MP. An immunohistochemical comparison of cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 15, cytokeratin 19, CAM 5.2, carcinoembryonic antigen, and nestin in differentiating porocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2012; 43: 1265–1272.

7. Mahomed F, Blok J, Grayson W. The squamous variant of eccrine porocarcinoma: a clinicopathological study of 21 cases. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61: 361–365.

8. Marone U, Caracò C, Anniciello AM, Di Monta G, Chiofalo MG, Di Cecilia ML, Mozzillo N. Metastatic eccrine porocarcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol 2011; 9: 32.

9. Patsner B, Mann WJ, Chumas J, Loesch M. Herpetiform cutaneous metastases following negative second look laparatomy for ovarian adenocarcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1988; 244: 63–67.

10. Kato N, Aoyagi S, Sugawara H, Mayuzumi M. Zosteriform and epidermotropic metastatic primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol 2001; 23: 216–220.

11. Ando K, Goto Y, Kato K, Murase T, Matsumoto Y, Ohashi M. Zosteriform inflammatory metastatic carcinoma from transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31: 284–286.

12. Hoshina D, Akiyama M, Hata H, Aoyagi S, Sato-Matsumura KC, Shimizu H. Eccrine porocarcinoma and Bowen’s disease arising in a seborrhoeic keratosis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2007; 32: 54–56.

13. Cascajo CD, Reichel M, Sánchez JL. Malignant neoplasms associated with seborrheic keratoses. An analysis of 54 cases. Am J Dermatopathol 1996; 18: 278–282.

14. Madan V, Cox NH, Gangopadhayay M. Porocarcinoma arising in a broad clonal seborrhoeic keratosis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2008; 33: 350–351.

15. Ko CJ, Shintaku P, Binder SW. Comparison of benign keratoses using p53, bcl-1, and bcl-2. J Cutan Pathol 2005; 32: 356–359.

Supplementary content
Figure SI