You are not logged in. Press here to login.

Content

List volumes - List articles in this issue

RELIABILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF THREE DIFFERENT PAIN ASSESSMENTS

doi: 10.1080/165019701753236473

Open access

Abstract:

The visual analogue scale (VAS) and ordered categorical scales, i.e. numeric rating scales (NRS), are commonly used in the assessment of pain. However, these scales are bounded by fixed endpoints and thus the range of measurement is limited. The disparity in repeated assessments of perceived pain intensity with the VAS, NRS, and electrical stimulation applied as a matching stimulus was studied in 69 patients (48 women and 21 men, 19-72 years) with chronic nociceptive or neurogenic pain. Responsiveness with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) using the same measurement procedures was evaluated in the same patients. Comparison of results from the three pain assessments showed that the painmatcher is at least as reliable and responsive as VAS and NRS. None of the three measurements showed evidence for systematic disagreement and had only significant random individual disagreement. They also showed evidence for responsiveness.

Authors:

Thomas Lundeberg, Iréne Lund, Lisbeth Dahlin, Elsebet Borg, Carina Gustafsson, Lena Sandin, Annika Rosén, Jan Kowalski, Sven V. Eriksson



Related articles

There are no related articles.


Actions


Abstract

PDF

Supplementary


There is no supplementary for this article.

Related articles


Click here to show related articles

Print information


Volume 33, Issue 6

DOI: 10.1080/165019701753236473

Pages: 279-283

View at PubMed