You are not logged in. Press here to login.


List volumes - List articles in this issue

Review article

Effects of physiotherapy in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: A systematic review of the literature

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0453

Open access


OBJECTIVE: To critically summarize the effectiveness of physio­therapy in patients presenting clinical signs of shoulder impingement syndrome.
DESIGN: Systematic review.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were searched electronically and manually from 1966 to December 2007. Study quality was independently assessed by 2 reviewers using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. If possible, relative risks and weighted mean differences were calculated for individual studies, and relative risks or standardized mean differences for pooled data, otherwise results were summarized in a best evidence synthesis.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included, with a mean quality score of 6.8 points out of 10. Many different diagnostic criteria for shoulder impingement syndrome were applied. Physio­therapist-led exercises and surgery were equally
effective treatments for shoulder impingement syndrome in the long term. Also, home-based exercises were as effective as combined physiotherapy interventions. Adding manual therapy to exercise programmes may have an additional benefit on pain at 3 weeks follow-up. Moderate evidence exists that passive treatments are not effective and cannot be justified.
CONCLUSION: This review shows an equal effectiveness of physiotherapist-led exercises compared with surgery in the long term and of home-based exercises compared with combined physiotherapy interventions in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome in the short and long term; passive treatments cannot be recommended for shoulder impingement syndrome. However, in general, the samples were small, and different diagnostic criteria were applied, which makes a firm conclusion difficult. More high-quality trials with longer follow-ups are recommended.


Thilo O. Kromer, Ulrike G. Tautenhahn, Rob A. de Bie, J. Bart Staal, Caroline H.G. Bastiaenen


  1. Östör AJK, Richards CA, Prevost AT, Speed CA, Hazleman BL. Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology 2005; 44: 800–805.
  2. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristic, and management. Ann Rheum Dis 1995; 54: 959–964
  3. Lewis JS, Green AS, Dekel S. The aetiology of subacromial impingement syndrome. Physiotherapy 2001; 87: 458–469.
  4. Green SE, Buchbinder R, Forbes A, Glazier R. Interventions for shoulder pain. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1999; (2): CD001156.
  5. Green SE, Buchbinder R, Hetrick S. Physiotherapy interventions for shoulder pain. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2003; (2): CD004258.
  6. Desmeules F, Cote CH, Fremont P. Therapeutic exercise and orthopaedic manual therapy for impingement syndrome: a systematic review. Clin J Sports Med 2003; 13: 176–182.
  7. van der Heijden GJ. Shoulder disorders: a state of the art review. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 1999; 13: 287–309.
  8. Faber E, Kuiper JI, Burdorf A, Miedema HS, Verhaar JAN. Treatment of impingement syndrome: a systematic review of the effects on functional limitations and return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2006; 16: 7–25.
  9. Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Burnet EN. Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 2004; 17: 152–164.
  10. Hughes PC, Taylor NF, Green RA. Most clinical tests cannot accurately diagnose rotator cuff pathology: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 2008; 54: 159–170.
  11. Burnett J, Grimmer K, Saravana K. Development of a generic critical appraisal tool by consensus: presentation of first round Delphi survey results. [Cited 2005 Jan] IJAHSP 2005; 3. Available from.
  12. Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K, Rose P, Randall T, Fitzpatrick R, et al. Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care: patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology 2006; 45: 215–221.
  13. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5 [updated 2005 May]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2005.
  14. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 713–721.
  15. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) [software]. Version 4.2 for Windows. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2003.
  16. van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2003; 28: 1290–1299.
  17. Citaker S, Taskiran H, Akdur H, Arabaci UO, Ekici C. Comparison of the mobilization and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation methods in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome. Pain Clinic 2005; 17: 197–202.
  18. Munday SL, Jones A, Brantingham JW, Globe G, Jensen M, Price JL. A randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of chiropractic shoulder girdle adjustment in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome. JACA – Journal of the American Chiropractic Association 2007; 44: 6–15.
  19. Peters G, Kohn D. Mittelfristige klinische Resultate nach operativer versus konservativer Behandlung des subakromialen Impingementsyndroms. Unfallchirurg 1997; 100: 623–629.
  20. Rahme H, Solem-Bertoft E, Westerberg C-E, Lundberg E, Sörensen S, Hilding S. The subacromial impingement syndrome. Scand J Rehab Med 1998; 30: 253–262.
  21. Senbursa G, Baltaci G, Atay A. Comparison of conservative treatment with and without manual physical therapy for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15: 915–921.
  22. Brox JI, Gjengedal E, Uppheim G, Bohmer AS, Brevik JI, Ljunggren AE, et al. Arthroscopic surgery versus supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome): a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 125 patients with a 2.5-year follow up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999; 8: 102–111.
  23. Haahr JP, Andersen JH. Exercises may be as efficient as subacromial decompression in patients with subacromial stage II impingement: 4 to 8 years follow up in a prospective randomized trial. Scand J Rheumatol 2006; 35: 224–228.
  24. Brox JI, Brevik JI, Ljunggren AE, Staff PH. Arthroscopic surgery compared with supervised exercises in patients with rotator cuff disease (stage II impingement syndrome). BMJ 1993; 307: 899–903.
  25. Haahr JP, Ostergaard S, Dalsgaard J, Norup K, Frost P, Lausen S, et al. Exercise versus arthroscopic decompression in patients with subacromial impingement: a randomised, controlled study in 90 cases with a one year follow up. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 760–764.
  26. Ludewig PM, Borstad JD. Effects of a home exercise programme on shoulder pain and functional status in construction workers. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60: 841–849.
  27. Dickens VA, Williams JL, Bahmra MS. Role of physiotherapy in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome: a prospective study. Physiotherapy 2005; 91: 159–164.
  28. Johansson KM, Adolfsson LE, Foldevi MOM. Effects of acupuncture versus ultrasound in patients with impingement syndrome: randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2005; 85: 490–501.
  29. Nykänen M. Pulsed ultrasound treatment of the painful shoulder a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Scand J Rehab Med 1995; 27: 105–108.
  30. Saunders L. The efficacy of low-level laser therapy in supraspinatus tendinitis. Clin Rehab 1995; 9: 126–134.
  31. Vecchio P, Cave M, King V, Adebajo AO, Smith M, Hazleman BL. A double-blind study of the effectiveness of low level laser treatment of rotator cuff tendinitis. Br J Rheumatol 1993; 32: 740–742.
  32. Aktas I, Akgun K, Cakmak B. Therapeutic effect of pulsed electromagnetic field in conservative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26: 1234–1239.
  33. Binder A, Parr G, Hazelman BL. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy of persistent rotator cuff tendinitis. Lancet 1984; 1: 695–698.
  34. Chard MD, Hazelman BL, Devereaux MD. Controlled study to investigate dose-response patterns to portable pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinitis. J Orthop Rheumatol 1988; 1: 33–40.
  35. Ginn KA, Cohen M. Exercise therapy for shoulder pain aimed at restoring neuromuscular control: a randomized comparative clinical trial. J Rehab Med 2005; 37: 115–122.
  36. Bang MD, Deyle GD. Comparison of supervised exercise with and without manual physical therapy for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2000; 30: 126–137.
  37. Conroy DE, Hayes KW. The effect of joint mobilization as a component of comprehensive treatment for primary shoulder impingement syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28: 3–14.
  38. Walther M, Werner A, Stahlschmitt T, Woelfel R, Gohlke F. The subacromial impingement syndrome of the shoulder treated by conventional physiotherapy, self-training, and a shoulder brace: results of a prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 417–423.
  39. Werner A, Walther M, Ilg A, Stahlschmitt T, Gohlke F. Zentrierende Kräftigungstherapie beim einfachen subakromialen Schmerzsyndrom: Eigentraining versus Krankengymnastik. Z Orthop 2002; 140: 375–380.
  40. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. Methods and processes of the CONSORT group: examples of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: W-60-W-66.
  41. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191–1194.

Related articles

There are no related articles.



Full text



There is no supplementary for this article.

Related articles

Click here to show related articles

Print information

Volume 41, Issue 11

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0453

Pages: 870-880

View at PubMed