You are not logged in. Press here to login.


List volumes - List articles in this issue

Original report

Combined study of transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor tractography for prediction of motor outcome in patients with corona radiata infarct.

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0793

Open access


OBJECTIVE: This study compared the usefulness of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), diffusion tensor tracto
graphy (DTT), and the combined study of TMS and DTT for prediction of motor outcome in patients with corona radiata infarct.
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with complete motor weakness of the affected hand were recruited. TMS and DTT were performed in the early stage (7–28 days) of stroke. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the presence of motor evoked potential in affected hand muscle, and according to the preservation of integrity of the affected corticospinal tract on DTT.
RESULTS: The specificity of TMS (0.93) was higher than that of DTT (0.48), and the sensitivity of DTT (0.86) was higher than that of TMS (0.66). There was a good outcome in 89.5% of patients with TMS (+) and DTT (+), which was similar to the patients (90.5%) with single TMS (+). In contrast, there was a poor outcome in 87.5% of patients with TMS (–) and DTT (–), which was higher than those with single TMS (–) (73.0%) or DTT (–) (77.8%).
CONCLUSION: TMS showed higher positive predictability and DTT showed higher negative predictability. The combined study of TMS and DTT appeared to be more advantageous in prediction of negative motor outcome than did each single study. Single TMS appeared to be more advantageous in prediction of positive motor outcome.


Yong Hyun Kwon, Su Min Son, Jun Lee, Dai Seok Bai, Sung Ho Jang


  1. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 1992; 23: 1084–1089.
  2. Davidoff RA. The pyramidal tract. Neurology 1990; 40: 332–339.
  3. York DH. Review of descending motor pathways involved with transcranial stimulation. Neurosurgery 1987; 20: 70–73.
  4. Prescott RJ, Garraway WM, Akhtar AJ. Predicting functional outcome following acute stroke using a standard clinical examination. Stroke 1982; 13: 641–647.
  5. Shelton FN, Reding MJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 107–112.
  6. Escudero JV, Sancho J, Bautista D, Escudero M, Lopez-Trigo J. Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1998; 29: 1854–1859.
  7. Heald A, Bates D, Cartlidge NE, French JM and Miller S. Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. Brain 1993; 116 (Pt 6): 1371–1385.
  8. Hendricks HT, Hageman G, van Limbeek J. Prediction of recovery from upper extremity paralysis after stroke by measuring evoked potentials. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997; 29: 155–159.
  9. van Kuijk AA, Pasman JW, Hendricks HT, Zwarts MJ, Geurts AC. Predicting hand motor recovery in severe stroke: the role of motor evoked potentials in relation to early clinical assessment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 45–51.
  10. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 2007; 130: 170–180.
  11. Jang SH, Kim YH, Chang Y, Han BS, Byun WM, Chang CH. The predictive value of cortical activation by passive movement for motor recovery in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 59–63.
  12. Cho SH, Kim DG, Kim DS, Kim YH, Lee CH, Jang SH. Motor outcome according to the integrity of the corticospinal tract determined by diffusion tensor tractography in the early stage of corona radiata infarct. Neurosci Lett 2007; 426: 123–127.
  13. Cho SH, Kim SH, Choi BY, Kang JH, Lee CH, Byun WM, et al. Motor outcome according to diffusion tensor tractography findings in the early stage of intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosci Lett 2007; 421: 142–146.
  14. Gillard JH, Papadakis NG, Martin K, Price CJ, Warburton EA, Antoun NM, et al. MR diffusion tensor imaging of white matter tract disruption in stroke at 3 T. Br J Radiol 2001; 74: 642–647.
  15. Jang SH, Ahn SH, Sakong J, Byun WM, Choi BY, Chang CH, et al. Comparison of TMS and DTT for predicting motor outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci 2010; 290: 107–111.
  16. Jang SH, Bai D, Son SM, Lee J, Kim DS, Sakong J, et al. Motor outcome prediction using diffusion tensor tractography in pontine infarct. Ann Neurol 2008; 64: 460–465.
  17. Jang SH, Cho SH, Kim YH, Han BS, Byun WM, Son SM, et al. Diffusion anisotrophy in the early stages of stroke can predict motor outcome. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2005; 23: 11–17.
  18. Konishi J, Yamada K, Kizu O, Ito H, Sugimura K, Yoshikawa K, et al. MR tractography for the evaluation of functional recovery from lenticulostriate infarcts. Neurology 2005; 64: 108–113.
  19. Kusano Y, Seguchi T, Horiuchi T, Kakizawa Y, Kobayashi T, Tanaka Y, et al. Prediction of functional outcome in acute cerebral hemorrhage using diffusion tensor imaging at 3T: a prospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1561–1565.
  20. Maeda T, Ishizaki K, Yura S. [Can diffusion tensor imaging predict the functional outcome of supra-tentorial stroke?]. No To Shinkei 2005; 57: 27–32 (in Japanese).
  21. Nelles M, Gieseke J, Flacke S, Lachenmayer L, Schild HH, Urbach H. Diffusion tensor pyramidal tractography in patients with anterior choroidal artery infarcts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 488–493.
  22. Yang Q, Tress BM, Barber PA, Desmond PM, Darby DG, Gerraty RP, et al. Serial study of apparent diffusion coefficient and anisotropy in patients with acute stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 2382–2390.
  23. Yoshioka H, Horikoshi T, Aoki S, Hori M, Ishigame K, Uchida M, et al. Diffusion tensor tractography predicts motor functional outcome in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2008; 62: 97–103; discussion 103.
  24. Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, Caramia MD, Caruso G, Cracco RQ, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 91: 79–92.
  25. Han BS, Hong JH, Hong C, Yeo SS, Lee D, Cho HK, et al. Location of the corticospinal tract at the corona radiata in human brain. Brain Res 2010; 1326: 75–80.
  26. Kim JS, Pope A. Somatotopically located motor fibers in corona radiata: evidence from subcortical small infarcts. Neurology 2005; 64: 1438–1440.
  27. Song YM. Somatotopic organization of motor fibers in the corona radiata in monoparetic patients with small subcortical infarct. Stroke 2007; 38: 2353–2355.
  28. Lincoln N, Jackson J, Adams S. Reliability and revision of the Nottingham sensory assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1998; 84: 358–365.
  29. Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther 1966; 46: 357–375.
  30. Fujii Y, Nakada T. Cortical reorganization in patients with subcortical hemiparesis: neural mechanisms of functional recovery and prognostic implication. J Neurosurg 2003; 98: 64–73.
  31. Mori S, Crain BJ, Chacko VP, van Zijl PC. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1999; 45: 265–269.
  32. Kunimatsu A, Aoki S, Masutani Y, Abe O, Hayashi N, Mori H, et al. The optimal trackability threshold of fractional anisotropy for diffusion tensor tractography of the corticospinal tract. Magn Reson Med Sci 2004; 3: 11–17.
  33. Lang CE, DeJong SL, Beebe JA. Recovery of thumb and finger extension and its relation to grasp performance after stroke. J Neurophysiol 2009; 102: 451–459.

Related articles

There are no related articles.



Full text



There is no supplementary for this article.

Related articles

Click here to show related articles

Print information

Volume 43, Issue 5

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0793

Pages: 430-434

View at PubMed