ContentList volumes - List articles in this issue
Motion of the drawing hand induces a progressive increase in muscle activity of the non-dominant hand in Ramachandran’s mirror-box therapy
OBJECTIVE: To observe the real-time muscle activity of bilateral hands while subjects draw circles under 2 conditions: with and without using Ramachandran’s mirror-box.
SUBJECTS: A total of 24 healthy volunteers.
METHODS: Subjects drew 4 circles sequentially using their dominant hand with the other hand at rest, both with and without looking at a mirror image. Circles were marked by 8 dots on the paper, which subjects connected up to draw the shape. The activity of the bilateral first dorsal interosseus muscles was recorded using surface electromyography.
RESULTS: Muscle activity of the dominant hand remained constant during each task. In contrast, muscle activity of the non-dominant hand increased under the condition of watching the image in the mirror, but was low under the non-watching condition. Furthermore, muscle activity of the non-dominant hand increased over the duration of the task. However, wide variation between subjects was observed under the mirror-image condition.
CONCLUSION: Increased muscle action potential of the non-dominant hand may be induced by the circle drawing task of the dominant hand during Ramachandran’s mirror-box therapy, which supports previous observations of increased brain activity caused by watching a mirror image.
Kiminobu Furukawa, Harue Suzuki, Jun Fukuda
Faculty of Rehabilitation and Care, Seijoh University, 476-8588 Aichi, Japan. E-mail: email@example.com
2. Ramachandran VS, Blakeslee S. Phantom in the brain. New York: Harper Collins Publishers; 1998.
3. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S. Touching the phantom limb. Nature 1995; 377: 489–490.
4. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci 1996; 22: 377–386.
5. Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, Magee A, Howard R, Pasquina PF, et al. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. N Engl J Med 2007; 22: 2206–2207.
6. Desmond DM, Kieran KO, Da Paor A, McDarby G, MacLachlan M. Augmenting the reality of phantom limbs: three case studies using an augmented mirror box procedure. J Prosthet Orthot 2006; 18: 74–79.
7. Murray CD, Patchick EL, Caillette F, Howard T, Pettifer S. Can immersive virtual reality reduce phantom limb pain? Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 119: 407–412.
8. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, van der Geest JN, Eckhardt M, Yavuzer G, Stam HJ, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 223–233.
9. Dohle C, Püllen J, Nakaten A, Küst J, Rietz C, Karbe H. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 209–217.
10. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, Sütbeyaz S, Bussmann JB, Köseoğlu F, et al. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 393–398.
11. Nojima I, Mima T, Koganemaru S, Thabit MN, Fukuyama H, Kawamata T. Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 1293–1300.
12. Michielsen ME, Smits M, Ribbers GM, Stam HJ, van der Geest JN, Bussmann JB, et al. The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82: 393–398.
13. Shinoura N, Suzuki Y, Watanabe Y, Yamada R, Tabei Y, Saito K, et al. Mirror therapy activates outside of cerebellum and ipsilateral M1. NeuroRehabilitation 2008; 23: 245–252.
14. Weeks SR, Anderson-Barnes VC, Tsao JW. Phantom limb pain: theories and therapies. Neurologist 2010; 16: 277–286.
15. McCabe C. Mirror visual feedback therapy. A practical approach. J Hand Ther 2011; 24: 170–178.
16. Rothgangel AS, Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Seitz RJ, Wade DT. The clinical aspects of mirror therapy in rehabilitation: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Rehabil Res 201; 34: 1–13.
17. Subedi B, Grossberg GT. Phantom limb pain: mechanisms and treatment approaches. Pain Res Treat 2011; 2011: 864605.
18. Armatas CA, Summers JJ, Bradshaw JL. Strength as a factor influencing mirror movements. Hum Mov Sci 1996; 15: 689–705.
19. Liederman J, Foley LM. A modified finger lift test reveals an asymmetry of motor overflow in adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1987; 9: 498–510.
20. Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB, Bradshaw JL, Armatas CA, Georgiou-Karistianis N. Investigating the cortical origins of motor overflow. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2004; 46: 315–327.
View at PubMed