You are not logged in. Press here to login.


List volumes - List articles in this issue

Original report

Functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling of patients with multiple sclerosis: Biomechanical and functional outcome – A pilot study

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0397

Open access


OBJECTIVE: To determine whether functional electrical
stimulation-supported ergometric training of patients with multiple sclerosis has a prosthetic or therapeutic effect on biomechanical (power, smoothness of cycling) and functional outcomes (walking capability, strength of muscle, spasticity).
DESIGN: Twelve subjects with multiple sclerosis participated in an electrical stimulation-supported ergometric training (3 sessions/week for 2 weeks). Measurements were made in a cross-over design to study prosthetic (with and without stimulation) and therapeutic effects (before and after training).
METHODS: Power and smoothness were calculated by cadence and torque recordings of cycling and spasticity; strength and walking capability were measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale, Manual Muscle Test, and 10-Metre Walk Test.
RESULTS: The power and smoothness of pedalling significantly improved prosthetically with electrical stimulation (p = 0.02), but did not show significant improvement over the 2 weeks of training. Significant short-term reductions in spasticity (before vs after training session; p < 0.05) were found. Isometric strength did not increase significantly during the 2-week training period and there was no improvement in walking ability.
CONCLUSION: Patients with multiple sclerosis are able to improve their cycling power and smoothness by pedalling with stimulation. We suggest that severely affected patients benefit more from functional electric stimulation-cycling therapy than do slightly affected patients.


Johann Szecsi, Cornelia Schlick, Martin Schiller, Walter Pöllmann, Nikolaus Koenig, Andreas Straube


  1. Beer S, Kesselring J. High prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Switzerland. Neuroepidemiology 1994; 13: 14–18.
  2. Weinshenker BG, Bass B, Rice GP, Noseworthy J, Carriere W, Baskerville J, Ebers GC. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability. Brain 1989; 112: 133–146.
  3. Kraft GH, Freal JE, Coryell JK. Disability, disease duration, and rehabilitation service needs in multiple sclerosis: patient perspectives. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 164–168.
  4. Petajan JH, Gappmaier E, White AT, Spencer MK, Mino L, Hicks RW. Impact of aerobic training on fitness and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1996; 39: 432–441.
  5. Mostert S, Kesselring J. Effects of a short-term exercise training program on aerobic fitness, fatigue, health perception and activity level of subjects with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2002; 8: 161–168.
  6. Petrofsky JS, Phillips CA. The use of functional electrical stimulation for rehabilitation of spinal cord injured patients. Cent Nerv Syst Trauma 1984; 1: 57–74.
  7. Mohr T, Podenphant J, Biering-Sorensen F, Galbo H, Thamsborg G, Kjaer M. Increased bone mineral density after prolonged electrically induced cycle training of paralyzed limbs in spinal cord injured man. Calcif Tissue Int 1997; 61: 22–25.
  8. Glenn WW, Phelps ML. Diaphragm pacing by electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve. Neurosurgery 1985; 17: 974–984.
  9. Glaser RM. Functional neuromuscular stimulation. Exercise conditioning of spinal cord injured patients. Int J Sports Med 1994; 15: 142–148.
  10. Perkins TA, Donaldson NN, Hatcher NA, Swain ID, Wood DE. Control of leg-powered paraplegic cycling using stimulation of the lumbo-sacral anterior spinal nerve roots. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2002; 10: 158–164.
  11. Hunt KJ, Stone B, Negard NO, Schauer T, Fraser MH, Cathcart AJ, et al. Control strategies for integration of electric motor assist and functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic cycling: utility for exercise testing and mobile cycling. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2004; 12: 89–101.
  12. Malezic M, Kljajic M, Acimovic-Janezic R, Gros N, Krajnik J, Stanic U. Therapeutic effects of multisite electric stimulation of gait in motor-disabled patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 553–560.
  13. Kralj A, Acimovic R, Stanic U. Enhancement of hemiplegic patient rehabilitation by means of functional electrical stimulation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993; 17: 107–114.
  14. Szecsi J, Krewer C, Muller F, Straube A. Functional electrical stimulation assisted cycling of patients with subacute stroke: kinetic and kinematic analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008; 23: 1086–1094.
  15. Taylor PN, Burridge JH, Dunkerley AL, Wood DE, Norton JA, Singleton C, et al. Clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator: its effect on the speed and effort of walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1577–1583.
  16. Glinsky J, Harvey L, Van Es P. Efficacy of electrical stimulation to increase muscle strength in people with neurological conditions: a systematic review. Physiother Res Int 2007; 12: 175–194.
  17. Livesley E. Effects of neuromuscular stimulation on functional performance of patients with multiple sclerosis. Physiotherapie 1992; 78: 914–917.
  18. Krause P, Szecsi J, Straube A. FES cycling reduces spastic muscle tone in a patient with multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation 2007; 22: 335–337.
  19. Takebe K, Kukulka C, Narayan MG, Milner M, Basmajian JV. Peroneal nerve stimulator in rehabilitation of hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1975; 56: 237–239.
  20. Liberson WT, Holmquest HJ, Scot D, Dow M. Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1961; 42: 101–105.
  21. Pape KE, Kirsch SE, Galil A, Boulton JE, White MA, Chipman M. Neuromuscular approach to the motor deficits of cerebral palsy: a pilot study. J Pediatr Orthop 1993; 13: 628–633.
  22. Humm AM, Beer S, Kool J, Magistris MR, Kesselring J, Rosler KM. Quantification of Uhthoff‘s phenomenon in multiple sclerosis: a magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 2493–2501.
  23. Chen HY, Chen SC, Chen JJ, Fu LL, Wang YL. Kinesiological and kinematical analysis for stroke subjects with asymmetrical cycling movement patterns. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2005; 15: 587–595.
  24. Medical Research Council. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. Memorandum No. 45. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office; 1976.
  25. Szecsi J, Krause P, Krafczyk S, Brandt T, Straube A. Functional output improvement in FES cycling by means of forced smooth pedaling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 764– 780.
  26. Perkins TA DN, Fitzwater R, Phillips GF, Wood DE. Leg powered paraplegic cycling system using surface functional electrical stimulation. IFESS Proceedings of the 7th Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Vienna, Austria, 2001, p. 36-39, ISBN: 3-900928-05-3.
  27. Szecsi J, Fornusek C, Krause P, Straube A. Low-frequency rectangular pulse is superior to middle frequency alternating current stimulation in cycling of people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 338–345.
  28. Nielsen JB, Crone C, Hultborn H. The spinal pathophysiology of spasticity – from a basic science point of view. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2007; 189: 171–180.
  29. Vos-Vromans DC, de Bie RA, Erdmann PG, van Meeteren NL. The responsiveness of the ten-meter walking test and other measures in patients with hemiparesis in the acute phase. Physiother Theory Pract 2005; 21: 173–180.
  30. Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 1314–1319.
  31. Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP, Sharma AK, Smith TL, Watkins CL. Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1013–1016.
  32. Brown DA, Kautz SA. Increased workload enhances force output during pedaling exercise in persons with poststroke hemiplegia. Stroke 1998; 29: 598–606.
  33. Bogey R, Hornby GT. Gait training strategies utilized in poststroke rehabilitation: are we really making a difference? Top Stroke Rehabil 2007; 14: 1–8.
  34. Pomeroy VM, King LM, Pollock A, Baily-Hallam A, Langhorne P. Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke; 2006 Jul 27 [Epub ahead of print].
  35. Karpatkin H. Multiple sclerosis and exercise – review of the evidence. Int J MS Care 2006; 7: 36–41.
  36. Tantucci C, Massucci M, Piperno R, Grassi V, Sorbini CA. Energy cost of exercise in multiple sclerosis patients with low degree of disability. Mult Scler 1996; 2: 161–167.
  37. Kent-Braun JA, Sharma KR, Weiner MW, Miller RG. Effects of exercise on muscle activation and metabolism in multiple sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 1994; 17: 1162–1169.
  38. Dalgas U, Stenager E, Ingemann-Hansen T. Multiple sclerosis and physical exercise: recommendations for the application of resistance-, endurance- and combined training. Mult Scler 2008; 14: 35–53.
  39. Jensen JL, Marstrand PC, Nielsen JB. Motor skill training and strength training are associated with different plastic changes in the central nervous system. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 1558–1568.
  40. Motl RW, Snook EM, Hinkle ML, McAuley E. Effect of acute leg cycling on the soleus H-reflex and modified Ashworth scale scores in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Neurosci Lett 2006; 406: 289–292.
  41. Henriksson J, Salmons S, Lowry OH. Chronic stimulation of mammalian muscle: enzyme and metabolic changes in individual fibres. Biomed Biochim Acta 1989; 48: S445–S454.

Related articles

There are no related articles.



Full text



There is no supplementary for this article.

Related articles

Click here to show related articles

Print information

Volume 41, Issue 8

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0397

Pages: 674-680

View at PubMed