Content » Vol 92, Issue 2

Letter to the Editor

Cutaneous Diphtheria in a German Man with Travel History

Azadeh Orouji1, Alexander Kiewert1, Thomas Filser2, Sergij Goerdt1 and Wiebke K. Peitsch1*

1Department of Dermatology, 2Medical Department II, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1–3, DE-68135 Mannheim, Germany. *E-mail:

Accepted June, 8, 2011.

Cutaneous diphtheria is still endemic in many tropical regions, but rarely seen in developed countries, where it is most commonly related to a history of travel. It is caused by infection with Corynebacterium diphtheria or, with increasing frequency, C. ulcerans (1, 2). C. diphtheriae and ulcerans occur in non-toxigenic and toxigenic strains, the latter producing the toxin responsible for the diphtheria disease and systemic toxic complications, such as neuritis and myocarditis. Both non-toxigenic and toxigenic strains may be harboured in the nasopharynx, skin, and other sites on asymptomatic carriers. They enhance in pre-existing skin lesions, commonly as co-infections with other pathogens (1, 2).

Case Report

A 55-year-old German man presented with a cutaneous ulcer of the knee, lasting for 4 weeks, which had developed from a painful nodule with purulent secretion. Extracutaneous symptoms, including fever, arthralgia, myalgia, headache and sore throat, were denied. The patient’s medical history was otherwise unremarkable. He was a social worker, spending most of the year in Nepal and Indonesia in close contact with local children and adolescents, and he had returned from Indonesia 3 weeks prior to referral. He had received all recommended vaccinations with regular boosting. Clinical examination showed an ulcer with firm brownish crusts and undermined margins sized 5 × 5 cm on the left knee (Fig. 1). There were no signs of lymphadenopathy, no lesions of the oropharyngeal mucosa, and no pathological findings of other organ systems. Laboratory tests revealed leucocytosis (17.7 × 109/l; normal: 4.2–10.2 × 109/l) with neutrophilia (75.9%) and elevated C-reactive protein (50.3 mg/l; normal: 0–5 mg/l).


Fig. 1. Ulcer with firm brownish crust and haemorrhage on the left knee.

In cultures of swabs from the lesion on blood-agar, masses of C. diphtheriae var gravis were identified, together with Group C haemolytic streptococci. Both strains were sensitive to penicillin and erythromycin. Diphtheria toxin gene PCR was negative. Cutaneous diphtheria caused by non-toxigenic C. diphtheriae var gravis was diagnosed. The patient was admitted to the infectious disease department and isolated. Treatment was initiated with penicillin 4 × 5 mega infusions and disinfection with polyhexanide, leading to rapid improvement. Later, when penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was also identified oral levofloxacin 250 mg 2/day
was added.

The patient had received his last booster vaccination for tetanus and diphtheria 6 months prior to presentation. When enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) was performed to determine C. diphtheriae antitoxin concentration, an adequate amount of antibodies was found (0.64 U/ml). As the isolated strain was non-toxigenic, diphtheria antitoxin injection was not required.


Primary cutaneous diphtheria lesions can range from a pustule, to an initially painful chronic non-healing ulcer with an adherent membrane and undermined margins. However, lesions may also be less distinctive. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required to induce appropriate diagnostics, as C. diphtheriae cannot be isolated by routine culturing methods.

In Germany, nine cases of cutaneous or pharyngeal diphtheria have been reported to the Robert Koch Institute in the last decade (3). As in other European and Northern American countries, most of these cases were imported (3–5). However, indigenous infections are also still observed, especially in homeless people and people with a history of alcohol or drug abuse (6, 7). Although diphtheria vaccination coverage is high in young Western European children, adolescents and adults have significant gaps in immunization, due to lack of adequate boosting (8, 9). Persistent occurrence of both indigenous and imported diphtheria cases highlights the importance of regular boosters, especially for travellers to endemic regions (10).

In recent years, non-toxigenic C. diphtheriae strains have been isolated with increasing frequency, both from skin lesions of individuals under poor hygienic conditions and from pharyngeal swabs of patients with throat infections (11–14). They can sometimes cause severe invasive infections, most frequently, endocarditis and septic arthritis (11, 12). Moreover, it has been discussed that they could mutate into toxigenic strains by acquiring the tox gene (15). Therefore, increased awareness and immediate treatment is warranted. Both toxigenic and non-toxigenic C. diphtheriae are usually susceptible to penicillin and erythromycin. Diphtheria antitoxin should be administered without delay in all cases with proven or suspected toxigenic strains (1).

Due to increased travel to endemic regions, the number of cases of cutaneous diphtheria may increase in the near future. As a result of the sometimes vague clinical appearance and common co-infection with other pathogens, the diagnosis is prone to be overlooked. Awareness among clinicians and microbiologists should be increased and appropriate swab specimens obtained from any non-healing skin lesion in patients with a history of travel.


  • Bonnet JM, Begg NT. Control of diphtheria: guidance for consultants in communicable disease control. World Health Organization. Commun Dis Public Health 1999; 2: 242–249.
  • Zeegelaar JE, Faber WR. Imported tropical infectious ulcers in travelers. Am J Clin Dermatol 2008; 9: 219–232.
  • Robert Koch-Institut: Infektionsepidemiologisches Jahrbuch für 2009, Berlin, 2010
  • Sing A, Heesemann J. Imported cutaneous diphtheria, Germany, 1997–2003. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11: 343–344.
  • de Benoist AC, White JM, Efstratiou A, Kelly C, Mann G, Nazareth B, et al. Imported cutaneous diphtheria, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10: 511–513.
  • Harnisch JP, Tronca E, Nolan CM, Turck M, Holmes KK. Diphtheria among alcoholic urban adults. A decade of experience in Seattle. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111: 71–82.
  • Monsuez JJ, Mathieu D, Arnoult F, Passeron J. Cutaneous diphtheria in a homeless man. Lancet 1995; 346: 649–650.
  • Reiter S, Poethko-Müller C. Aktuelle Entwicklung von Impfquoten und Impflücken bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2009; 52: 1037–1044.
  • Edmunds WJ, Pebody RG, Aggerback H, Baron S, Berbers G, Conyn-van Spaendonck MA, et al. The sero-epidemiology of diphtheria in Western Europe. ESEN Project. European Sero-Epidemiology Network. Epidemiol Infect 2000; 125: 113–125.
  • Gautret P, Wilder-Smith A. Vaccination against tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis and poliomyelitis in adult travellers. Travel Med Infect Dis 2010; 8: 155–160.
  • Gubler J, Huber-Schneider C, Gruner E, Altwegg M. An outbreak of nontoxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae infection: single bacterial clone causing invasive infection among Swiss drug users. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27: 1295–1298.
  • Romney MG, Roscoe DL, Bernard K, Lai S, Efstratiou A, Clarke AM. Emergence of an invasive clone of nontoxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae in the urban poor population of Vancouver, Canada. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 1625–1629.
  • Shashikala P, Reddy PV, Prashanth K, Kanungo R, Devi S, Anitha P, et al. Persistence of nontoxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae biotype gravis strains in Pondicherry, Southern India. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49: 763–764.
  • Wagner KS, White JM, Neal S, Crowcroft NS, Kuprevičiene N, Paberza R, et al. Screening for Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans in patients with upper respiratory tract infections 2007–2008: a multicentre European study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011; 17: 519–525.
  • Cianciotto NP, Groman NB. Characterization of bacteriophages from tox-containing, non-toxigenic isolates of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Microb Pathog 1997; 22: 343–351.