Content » Vol 99, Issue 3

Short communication

Anetoderma and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Case Report and Literature Review

Álvaro Iglesias-Puzas1, Ana Batalla1, Gonzalo Peón1, Carlos Álvarez2 and Ángeles Flórez1

1Dermatology Department, and 2Pathology Department, Pontevedra University Hospital, EOXI Pontevedra-Salnés, Centro de Especialidades Mollavao, c/ Simón Bolívar s/n., ES-36001 Pontevedra, Spain. E-mail: alvaroigpu@gmail.com

Accepted Dec 6, 2018; E-published Dec 6, 2018

INTRODUCTION

Anetoderma is a rare skin condition marked by circum-scribed areas of slack skin due to the loss of dermal elastic fibres. Based on aetiology, anetoderma can be classified into 2 forms. Primary anetoderma (PA) develops in clinically normal skin (Schweninger-Buzzi type) or after a non-specific inflammatory process (Jadassohn-Pellizzari type), whereas secondary anetoderma arises from an abnormal reparative mechanism of well-defined preceding skin diseases (1, 2).

Anetoderma has been related to different immunological diseases, ranging from simple serological findings to well-defined pathologies (2). Although the connection may not be so much with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) (3), patients with both conditions (anetoderma and SLE) in the absence of APA have been described (4, 5). Moreover, the pathophysiology, as well as a temporary relationship between APA, SLE development and onset of anetoderma, have not been well established.

CASE REPORT

A 43-year-old man presented with a 1-year history of gradually spreading, non-itching skin lesions that had appeared on his trunk and left arm. Regarding his previous medical history, he had been diagnosed with SLE 8 years previously due to the presence of erythema after sun exposure, discoid facial lesions, oral ulcers and consistent positive serology (antinuclear antibodies (ANA) >1/640 speckled pattern and anti-double-stranded antibodies (dsDNA) > 1/10). There was no history of vascular thrombosis, neurological disorders or heart valve defects. His condition had been treated with hydroxychloroquine for 3 years. Since he became asymptomatic, he had decided to drop out of the treatment and was lost to follow-up.

Physical examination showed well-circumscribed, erythematous round plaques with overlying wrinkled skin and herniation phenomenon on his left arm and upper and lower back. These lesions had developed on previously healthy skin according to the patient’ medical records (Fig. 1).


Fig. 1. Well-circumscribed, erythematous, round plaques with overlying wrinkled skin and herniation phenomenon on the upper and lower back.

Laboratory studies demonstrated no abnormalities except persistent lymphopaenia (lymphocytes <1,200/mm3). Immunological studies revealed a negative extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) panel, low serum levels of C3 (80 mg/dl, normal range 88–201 mg/dl) and negative APA. Serological tests, including for HIV, syphilis and Borrelia, were also negative.

A skin biopsy from a lesion on his back showed superficial and deep perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with no thrombi detected in dermal blood vessels. Verhoeff-van Gieson staining evidenced depletion and fragmentation of elastic fibres, which was more evident in the upper dermis (Fig. 2). Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) study detected granular IgG (+++), IgM (++) and C3 (+++) deposits in the basement membrane and blood vessels of involved skin. These findings confirmed the diagnosis of anetoderma in a patient with SLE.

Based on the association of anetoderma with APA, the patient was tested for APA with a 6-month periodicity. One year later, positive results for lupus anticoagulant test (dilute Russell viper venom time (DRVVT) ratio >1.2) and beta-2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies (IgG > 46.7 IU, positive > 20 IU) were found. Regarding the absence of criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome, the patient was advised not to smoke or gain weight, and hydroxychloroquine was prescribed again.


Fig. 2. (a) Superficial and deep perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with no thrombi in dermal blood vessels (haematoxylin and eosin ×40). (b) Verhoeff-van Gieson staining depletion and fragmentation of the elastic fibres, which was more evident in the upper dermis (Verhoeff-van Gieson staining ×40).

DISCUSSION

Anetoderma is an elastolytic disorder characterized by localized areas of wrinkled or flaccid skin due to a decrease in the amount of normal elastic tissue (5, 6). This condition has classically been connected with autoimmune diseases, such as SLE or lupus-like syndromes (2, 3). However, the most consistent reported association of anetoderma within the spectrum of autoimmune features is the presence of APA, prevalence of which in SLE is greatly increased (3, 4, 7). Anetoderma could be consequently considered as a skin manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome (8), even though not all patients with this association will develop prothrombotic abnormalities (9, 10).

A PubMed search, of the English-language medical literature, using the keywords “systemic lupus erythematous” and “anetoderma” yielded 16 reports comprising 22 patients presenting both entities (Table SI) (1–16). Considering all those reported cases showing positive APA (19/23 cases), only 6 patients fulfilled the criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Regarding the relationship between anetoderma and APA, it has been described that these antibodies may cause dermal microthromboses, which could lead to focal ischaemia and subsequent destruction of elastic tissue (9). Since microthromboses were found in only 6 out of 23 biopsy specimens, they may not necessarily cause anetoderma. However, at least 7 reported cases were found with more than 4 years of ongoing lesions. Thus, it is impossible to know whether microthromboses actually occurred, or if this finding was not seen due to the time lapse between the onset of the lesions and the biopsy (10).

Some authors believe that elastic fibres may be the target of antibodies against shared epitopes between phospholipids (probably beta-2-glycoprotein 1) and elastin (5).

On the other hand, the indispensable presence of APA for development of anetoderma could be called into question, as 4 patients presented with SLE-A and were tested negative for APA. Interestingly, one of these patients demonstrated immune deposits in the involved skin, supporting the role of additional immunological mechanisms in some cases.

The relatively few DIF studies of anetoderma lesions in patients with SLE performed to date have shown positive results in 85% cases, of which positive lupus band test was the most common finding. In 1990, Bergman et al. (17) described 9 patients with positive linear or granular immunoreactants along the dermoepidermal junction on PA-affected skin. Although none of the patients in this group fulfilled the minimum number of SLE criteria, they concluded that some patients with PA had DIF findings indistinguishable from those of SLE, which may also reinforce the hypothesis of a primary immunological event.

The temporal relationship between anetoderma, SLE and APA has not been well established. It is noteworthy that 2 patients with SLE who developed anetoderma were later found to have positive APA, which may question their causal effect on the onset of anetoderma. Since at least 7 patients with SLE-A were simultaneously diagnosed as positive for APA, the concurrence of these entities may not be coincidental. Moreover, with time, SLE has become evident in some patients with PA who previously did not fulfil the criteria for this diagnosis (7, 13).

In conclusion, this rare elastolytic disorder may be part of a wide spectrum of autoimmune disorders, the elastic fibres being one of the potential target tissues. In diagnosing patients who present with anetoderma and negative APA there is doubt about a definitive cause and effect relationship between these entities, and therefore a systemic search for autoimmune disorders and long-term follow-up should be performed in all cases.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES
  1. Bilen N, Bayramgurler D, Sikar A, Ercin C, Yilmaz A. Anetoderma associated with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2003; 12: 714–716.
    View article    Google Scholar
  2. Xia FD, Hoang MP, Smith GP. Anetoderma before development of antiphospholipid antibodies: delayed development and monitoring of antiphospholipid antibodies in an SLE patient presenting with anetoderma. Dermatol Online J 2017; 23.
    View article    Google Scholar
  3. Stephansson EA, Niemi KM, Jouhikainen T, Vaarala O, Palosuo T. Lupus anticoagulant and the skin. A longterm follow-up study of SLE patients with special reference to histopathological findings. Acta Derm Venereol 1991; 71: 416–422.
    View article    Google Scholar
  4. Haider M, Alenazi M, Almutawa A, Alfadley A. Lupus erythematosus-associated primary and secondary anetoderma. J Cutan Med Surg 2012; 16: 64–67.
    View article    Google Scholar
  5. Jeong NJ, Park SB, Im M, Seo YJ, Lee JH, Lee Y. Eruptive anetoderma in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Dermatol 2014; 26: 621–623.
    View article    Google Scholar
  6. Alvarez-Cuesta CC, Raya-Aguado C, Fernandez-Rippe ML, Sanchez TS, Perez-Oliva N. Anetoderma in a systemic lupus erythematosus patient with anti-PCNA and antiphospholipid antibodies. Dermatology 2001; 203: 348–350.
    View article    Google Scholar
  7. Montilla C, Alarcon-Segovia D. Anetoderma in systemic lupus erythematosus: relationship to antiphospholipid antibodies. Lupus 2000; 9: 545–547.
    View article    Google Scholar
  8. Fernandez-Galar M, Espana A, Lloret P. Systemic lupus erythematosus-associated anetoderma and anti-phospholipid antibodies. Clin Exp Dermatol 2003; 28: 39–42.
    View article    Google Scholar
  9. Sabio JM, Tercedor J, Massare E, Jimenez-Alonso J. Anetoderma associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid antibodies. Lupus 2004; 13: 826–827.
    View article    Google Scholar
  10. Sparsa A, Piette JC, Wechsler B, Amoura Z, Frances C. Anetoderma and its prothrombotic abnormalities. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 1008–1012.
    View article    Google Scholar
  11. Venencie PY, Winkelmann RK, Moore BA. Anetoderma. Clinical findings, associations, and long-term follow-up evaluations. Arch Dermatol 1984; 120: 1032–1039.
    View article    Google Scholar
  12. Disdier P, Christides C, Andrac-Meyer L, Rojat-Habib MC, Aillaud MF, Swiader L, et al. L’anetodermie au cours du Syndrome des Antiphospholipides. Trois cas. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1996; 123: 800–803.
    View article    Google Scholar
  13. Stephansson EA, Niemi KM. Antiphospholipid antibodies and anetoderma: are they associated? Dermatology 1995; 191: 204–209.
    View article    Google Scholar
  14. Marzano A, Vanotti M, Alessi E. Anetodermic lupus panniculitis and antiphospholipid antibodies: report of three cases. Acta Derm Venereol 2004; 84: 385–388.
    View article    Google Scholar
  15. Venhoff N, Miehle N, Juttner E, Peter HH, Walker UA. Clinical images: anetoderma in systemic lupus erythematosus with antiphospholipid antibodies. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 2228.
    View article    Google Scholar
  16. Funabiki M, Tanioka M, Miyachi Y, Utani A. Anetoderma accompanying microscopic panniculitis in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009; 34: 259–261.
    View article    Google Scholar
  17. Bergman R, Friedman-Birnbaum R, Hazaz B, Cohen E, Munichor M, Lichtig C. An immunofluorescence study of primary anetoderma. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990; 15: 124–130.
    View article    Google Scholar
Supplementary content
Table SI
Advertisement