Content » Vol 101, January

Short communication

Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia with c.28delG Mutation in Ectodysplasin A Gene and Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated Successfully with Tofacitinib

Xiangqian Li1, Xia Wu1, Dirk M. Elston2, Jianzhong Zhang1 and Cheng Zhou1*

1Department of Dermatology, Peking University People’s Hospital, No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, China and 2Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. *E-mail: chengzhou@live.cn

Accepted Nov 11, 2020; Epub ahead of print Nov 16, 2020

Acta Derm Venereol 2021; 101: adv00352.

doi: 10.2340/00015555-3693

INTRODUCTION

Ectodermal dysplasia is a group of rare genetic disorders that affect structures of ectodermal origin, which includes nearly 170 syndromes (1). Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED), the most common variation, is characterized by hypohidrosis or anhidrosis, hypotrichosis, hypodontia or anodontia, and distinct facial features, including prominent forehead and lips, epicanthic fold, everted nose, and prognathism.

HED has autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked forms (2). The most frequent subtype is X-linked HED (XL-HED; MIM #305100), with a prevalence of 1.6–22 per 100,000 persons, which is caused by mutations in the ectodysplasin A gene (EDA; NM_001399.4) located at Xq12–q13.1 (3). Currently, according to the NCBI ClinVar database, at least 131 novel pathogenic mutations have been identified in patients with HED, among which more than 80% were EDA mutations (4). The EDA gene encodes the transmembrane protein EDA, a member of the tumour necrosis factor α-related signalling pathway (1, 5). The protein is critical for signal transduction from ectoderm to mesenchyme, leading to the development of hair follicles, teeth, skin, nails, and eccrine glands during morphogenesis.

Additional findings associated with XL-HED may include recurrent upper respiratory infections, asthma, nasal crusting, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, dry skin and eczema (6). We report here a novel mutation of the EDA gene in a Chinese patient with HED and severe atopic dermatitis that responded well to the treatment of an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, tofacitinib.

CASE REPORT

A 22-year-old man presented with severe itching for more than 20 years and early-onset asthma. He was the second child of non-consanguineous parents and all his relatives were unaffected. Examination revealed xerosis and extensive lichenification on the face, trunk and extremities (Fig. 1b, d). Multiple, discrete, flesh-coloured follicular keratotic papules were noted on the forehead and cheeks, and confluent pinkish plaques were noted on the occipital scalp, compatible with keratosis follicularis spinulosa decalvans (KFSD) (Fig. 1a, b). His scalp hair, eyebrows and eyelashes were sparse, and body hair (including pubic hair) was absent. His facial appearance included a saddle nose, everted lips, frontal bossing and small chin (Fig. 1a). Teeth were absent and faciocervical poikiloderma was noted. Nails and mucosa were normal. White blood cell count was 9.21/μl with 12.7% eosinophils, and the total serum IgE was >2,000 IU/ml. Serum allergen-specific IgE antibody scoring was class 6 for Artemisia and cedar pollen, class 5 for ragweed and cat hair, class 4 for dog hair and altenuene (Alternaria), class 3 for cypress pollen, class 2 for house dust mites, and class 1 for ascarid.


Fig. 1. Clinical features. (a) Characteristic facial appearance, presenting as frontal bossing, small chin, everted lips, sebaceous hyperplasia, atrophy and alopecia of the temporal scalp. (b–e) Eczematous lesions with lichenification on the trunk: before and after 2 weeks of oral tofacitinib, showing significantly improvement. (b, c) Back, (d, e) chest and abdomen.

After obtaining written informed consent, peripheral blood was collected from the proband and his mother, and genomic DNA was isolated. Genomic DNA was also extracted from 100 unrelated healthy Chinese individuals as controls. A hemizygous deletion mutation in the EDA gene (c.28delG; p.E10Nfs*47) was identified in the proband by next generation sequencing and verified by Sanger sequencing. His mother was found to be a carrier with a heterozygous mutation (Fig. 2). The mutation was not found in normal controls or in the Human Gene Mutation Database (http://www.hgmd.org). No mutation was found in atopic dermatitis-associated genes, including FLG, SPINK5, KLK5 and CLDN1 genes.


Fig. 2. Molecular analysis of the ectodysplasin A (EDA) gene. (a) Sequencing analysis identified a hemizygosity deletion mutation, c.28delG; p.E10Nfs*47, in exon 1 in the patient. (b) Results of the DNA sequencing analysis of his mother. Deletion site indicated by arrows.

The patient did not respond to treatment with oral antihistamines, topical corticosteroids or traditional Chinese medicines and declined treatment with methotrexate and ciclosporin. Dupilumab was not available in China at the time, and he was prescribed oral tofacitinib tablets 5 mg twice daily based on availability and the success of other JAK inhibitors in atopic dermatitis. The skin lesions and pruritus were significantly improved after 2 weeks of treatment with tofacitinib (Fig. 1c, e). The percentage of blood eosinophils fell to 3.3% (absolute count 0.30/μl). Sweating showed no significant change, but his asthma did not recur during the drug therapy. Continuous improvement in skin symptoms and the appearance of vellus hair on the forehead were noted over the next 6 months with no adverse events. 

DISCUSSION

We describe here a novel EDA mutation leading to XL-HED with severe atopic dermatitis. To date, approximately 340 variants have been reported in EDA genes (Human Gene Mutation Database). Among these, 187 (54.8%) were missense/nonsense mutations, 87 (25.5%) were deletions, 32 (9.4%) were splicing, 28 (8.2%) were insertions and 7 (2.1%) were indels. The phenotype relates to the type and location of mutations. EDA mutations with protein truncating (including frameshift and nonsense) correlate with a more severe phenotype, and missense mutations associated with a milder phenotype (2). Burger et al. (7) reported that EDA genotype correlates with the severity of atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in XL-HED patients. The deletion mutation of c.28delG (p.E10Nfs*47) in the current patient resulted in loss-of-function of the signalling protein EDA, affecting the ectodysplasin/nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signalling pathway (5, 8), and resulted in severe atopic dermatitis. Patients with HED often have dry skin (94%) and eczematous skin (47–84%) in various degrees (7, 9, 10) as well as bronchial asthma (>30%), allergic rhinitis (>70%) and physician-diagnosed food allergies (20.7%) (11). The current patient presented with severe atopic dermatitis and KFSD-like skin lesions, which has not been reported previously in XL-HED-affected patients.

Tofacitinib is a JAK1-3 inhibitor (12, 13), which is available in China. Based on prior reports of response to JAK inhibitors (13, 14), tofacitinib was prescribed in the current patient and resulted in rapid and sustained improvement in pruritus and skin lesions.

We speculate that the novel loss-of-function mutation in EDA resulted in defective activation of NF-κB pathway and upregulation of inflammatory cytokines that activate JAK signalling. This patient’s response suggests that JAK inhibitors deserve further study in patients with atopic dermatitis associated with ectodermal dysplasia.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The patient provided written informed consent to publication of his case details.

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81773311).

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES
1. Trzeciak WH, Koczorowski R. Molecular basis of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: an update. J Appl Genet 2016; 57: 51-61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-015-0307-4

2. Zeng B, Lu H, Xiao X, Zhou L, Lu J, Zhu L, et al. Novel EDA mutation in X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia and genotype-phenotype correlation. Oral Dis 2015; 21: 994-1000.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12376

3. Nguyen-Nielsen M, Skovbo S, Svaneby D, Pedersen L, Fryzek J. The prevalence of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED) in Denmark, 1995-2010. Eur J Med Genet 2013; 56: 236-242.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2013.01.012

4. Han Y, Wang X, Zheng L, Zhu T, Li Y, Hong J, et al. EDA pathogenic mutations in Chinese Han families with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia and genotype-phenotype: a correlation analysis. Front Genet 2020; 11: 21.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00021

5. Kere J, Srivastava AK, Montonen O, Zonana J, Thomas N, Ferguson B, et al. X-linked anhidrotic (hypohidrotic) ectodermal dysplasia is caused by mutation in a novel transmembrane protein. Nat Genet 1996; 13: 409-416.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0895-409

6. Clarke A, Phillips DI, Brown R, Harper PS. Clinical aspects of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Arch Dis Child 1987; 62: 989-996.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.62.10.989

7. Burger K, Schneider AT, Wohlfart S, Kiesewetter F, Huttner K, Johnson R, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in boys with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. J Med Genet A 2014; 164A: 2424-2432.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36541

8. D'Assante R, Fusco A, Palamaro L, Giardino G, Gallo V, Cirillo E, et al. Unraveling the link between ectodermal disorders and primary immunodeficiencies. Int Rev Immunol 2016; 35: 25-38.

9. More CB, Bhavsar K, Joshi J, Varma SN, Tailor M. Hereditary ectodermal dysplasia: a retrospective study. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2013; 4: 445-450.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.117012

10. Miyake T, Kiniwa Y, Kosho T, Nakano H, Okuyama R. Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: A report of two cases. J Dermatol 2017; 44: 479-481.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.13479

11. Mark BJ, Becker BA, Halloran DR, Bree AF, Sindwani R, Fete MD, et al. Prevalence of atopic disorders and immunodeficiency in patients with ectodermal dysplasia syndromes. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2012; 108: 435-438.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2012.04.010

12. Bissonnette R, Papp KA, Poulin Y, Gooderham M, Raman M, Mallbris L, et al. Topical tofacitinib for atopic dermatitis: a phase IIa randomized trial. Br J Dermatol 2016; 175: 902-911.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14871

13. Levy LL, Urban J, King BA. Treatment of recalcitrant atopic dermatitis with the oral Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib citrate. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 73: 395-399.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.06.045

14. Guttman-Yassky E, Silverberg JI, Nemoto O, Forman SB, Wilke A, Prescilla R, et al. Baricitinib in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 2 parallel, double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled multiple-dose study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 80: 913-921.e919
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.01.018