Leo D. Roorda, John Green, Kiki R.A. De Kluis, Ivo W. Molenaar, Pam Bagley, Jane Smith , Alexander C. H. Geurts
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0249

Objective: To investigate the cross-cultural validity of international Dutch-English comparisons when using the Dutch Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), and the intra-test reliability and construct validity of the Dutch RMI.
Methods: Cross-cultural validity was studied in a combined data-set of Dutch and English patients undergoing rehabilitation after stroke, who were assessed with the Dutch version of the RMI and the original English RMI, respectively. Mokken scale analysis was used to investigate unidimensionality, monotone homogeneity model fit, and differential item functioning between the Dutch and the English RMI. Intra-test reliability and construct validity were studied in the Dutch patients by calculating the reliability coefficient and correlating the Dutch RMI and the Dutch Barthel Index.
Results: The RMI was completed for Dutch (n = 200) and English (n = 420) patients after stroke. The unidimensionality and monotone homogeneity model fit of the RMI were excellent: combined Dutch-English data-set (coefficient H = 0. 91); Dutch data-set (coefficient H = 0. 93); English data-set (coefficient H = 0. 89). No differential item functioning was found between the Dutch and the English RMI. The intra-test reliability of the Dutch RMI was excellent (coefficient ρ = 0. 97). In a sub-sample of patients (n = 91), the Dutch RMI correlated strongly with the Dutch Barthel Index (Spearman's correlation coefficient ρ = 0. 84).
Conclusion: The Dutch RMI allows valid international Dutch-English comparisons, and has excellent intra-test reliability and construct validity.

Appendix I
Appendix II