Efficacy of rehabilitation for patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Comparison of a four-week rehabilitation
programme in a Mediterranean and a Norwegian setting
Yndis A. Staalesen Strumse, Bjørn-Yngvar Nordvåg, Johan K. Stanghelle, Mona Røisland, Anne Winther, Pär-Arne Pajunen, Torhild Garen, Berit Flatø
Objective: To investigate the sustained effect of a rehabilitation programme for patients with ankylosing spondylitis, and to compare the effect of this intervention given in a Mediterranean vs a Norwegian setting.
Methods: A total of 107 patients with ankylosing spondylitis applying for rehabilitation were randomized to a 4-week inpatient rehabilitation programme in a Mediterranean country or in Norway. The participants were evaluated clinically before and after the rehabilitation period (week 0 and 4) and in week 16. The ASsessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis working group’s Improvement Criteria (ASAS-IC), and tests of spinal mobility and physical capacity were used to measure treatment response.
Results: An ASAS20 improvement was still present at week 16 in 50% of the patients treated in a Mediterranean and 23% in a Norwegian centre (p = 0. 006). The tests of spinal mobility, physical capacity, and almost all patient’s assessments of health status (ASAS-IC components) were still improved at week 16 after therapy in both climatic settings. While the improvements in physical capacity were comparable, the spinal mobility and ASAS-IC components improved more, and improvements were sustained longer, after rehabilitation in a Mediterranean setting.
Conclusion: Patients with ankylosing spondylitis benefit from a 4-week rehabilitation programme in Norway, but even more so from a similar programme in a Mediterranean setting.
Do you want to comment on this paper? The comments will show up here and if appropriate the comments will also separately be forwarded to the authors.
You need to login/create an account to comment on articles. Click here to login/create an account