List volumes - List articles in this issue

Clinical Report

Assessment of Pruritus Intensity: Prospective Study on Validity and Reliability of the Visual Analogue Scale, Numerical Rating Scale and Verbal Rating Scale in 471 Patients with Chronic Pruritus

doi: 10.2340/00015555-1246


The most commonly used tool for self-report of pruritus intensity is the visual analogue scale (VAS). Similar tools are the numerical rating scale (NRS) and verbal rating scale (VRS). In the present study, initiated by the International Forum for the Study of Itch assessing reliability of these tools, 471 randomly selected patients with chronic itch (200 males, 271 females, mean age 58.44 years) recorded their pruritus intensity on VAS (100-mm line), NRS (0–10) and VRS (four-point) scales. Re-test reliability was analysed in a subgroup of 250 patients after one hour. Statistical analysis showed a high reliability and concurrent validity (r>0.8; p<0.01) for all tools. Mean values of all scales showed a high correlation. In conclusion, high reliability and concurrent validity was found for VAS, NRS and VRS. On re-test, higher correlation and less missing values were observed. A training session before starting a clinical trial is recommended.


Ngoc Quan Phan, Christine Blome, Fleur Fritz, Joachim Gerss, Adam Reich, Toshiya Ebata, Matthias Augustin, Jacek C. Szepietowski, Sonja Ständer


  • Ständer S, Schäfer I, Phan NQ, Blome C, Herberger K, Heigel H, et al. Prevalence of chronic pruritus in Germany: results of a cross-sectional study in a sample working population of 11,730. Dermatology 2010; 221: 229–235.
  • Metz M, Ständer S. Chronic pruritus – pathogenesis, clinical aspects and treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24: 1249–1260.
  • Ständer S, Weisshaar E, Mettang T, Szepietowski JC, Carstens E, Ikoma A et al. Clinical classification of itch: a position paper of the International Forum for the Study of Itch. Acta Derm Venereol 2007; 87: 291–294.
  • Hayes MHS, Patterson DG. Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin 1921; 18: 98–99.
  • Flaherty SA. Pain measurement tools for clinical practice and research. AANA J 1996; 64: 133–140.
  • Miller MD, Ferris DG. Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the Visual Analogue Scale. Fam Pract Res J 1993; 13: 15–24.
  • Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2: 175–184.
  • Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14: 798–804.
  • [No authors listed]. Severity scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index. Consensus Report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology 1993; 186: 23–31.
  • Aitken RC. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 1969; 62: 989–993.
  • Litwin M. How to measure survey reliability and validity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1995.
  • Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res 2010; 68: 319–323.
  • Carmines C, Zeller R. Reliability and validity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1979.
  • Weisshaar E, Dalgard F. Epidemiology of itch: adding to the burden of skin morbidity. Acta Derm Venereol 2009; 89: 339–350.
  • Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8: 1153–1157.
  • Dhanani S, Quenneville J, Perron M, Abdolell M, Feldman BM. Minimal difference in pain associated with change in quality of life in children with rheumatic disease. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 47: 501–505.
  • Reich A, Heisig M, Szepietowski JC. Visual Analogue Scale as a validated assessment of pruritus intensity. Acta Derm Venereol 2009; 89: 688.
  • Szepietowski JC, Schwartz RA. Uremic pruritus. Int J Dermatol 1998; 37: 247–253.
  • Elman S, Hynan LS, Gabriel V, Mayo MJ. The 5-D itch scale: a new measure of pruritus. Br J Dermatol 2010; 162: 587–593.
  • Majeski CJ, Johnson JA, Davison SN, Lauzon CJ. Itch Severity Scale: a self-report instrument for the measurement of pruritus severity. Br J Dermatol 2007; 156: 667–673.
  • Wahlgren CF. Measurement of itch. Semin Dermatol 1995; 14: 277–284.
  • Phan NQ, Ständer S. Assessment of pruritus intensity: correlation between visual analogue scale (VAS), numeric rating scale (NRS) and verbal rating scale (VRS) in patients with chronic pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol 2009; 89: 713.
  • Jenkins HH, Spencer ED, Weissgerber AJ, Osborne LA, Pellegrini JE. Correlating an 11-point verbal numeric rating scale to a 4-point verbal rating scale in the measurement of pruritus. J Perianesth Nurs 2009; 24: 152–155.
  • Wahlgren CF, Ekblom A, Hägermark O. Some aspects of the experimental induction and measurement of itch. Acta Derm Venereol 1989; 69: 185–189.
  • Wahlgren CF. Children’s rating of itch: an experimental study. Pediatr Dermatol 2005; 22: 97–101.
  • Darsow U, Scharein E, Simon D, Walter G, Bromm B, Ring J. New aspects of itch pathophysiology: component analysis of atopic itch using the ‘Eppendorf Itch Questionnaire’. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2001; 124: 326–331.
  • Yosipovitch G, Zucker I, Boner G, Gafter U, Shapira Y, David M. A questionnaire for the assessment of pruritus: validation in uremic patients. Acta Derm Venereol 2001; 81: 108–111.
  • Weisshaar E, Apfelbacher C, Jäger G, Zimmermann E, Bruckner T, Diepgen TL, et al. Pruritus as a leading symptom: clinical characteristics and quality of life in German and Ugandan patients. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155: 957–964.
  • Ständer S. CME: Chronischer Pruritus Prinzipien der Diagnostik und Therapie. Hautarzt 2007; 58: 627–638.
  • Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) – a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994; 19: 210–216.
  • Desai NS, Poindexter GB, Monthrope YM, Bendeck SE, Swerlick RA, Chen SC. A pilot quality-of-life instrument for pruritus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59: 234–244.
  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–370.
  • Blome C, Augustin M, Siepmann D, Phan NQ, Rustenbach SJ, Ständer S. Measuring patient-relevant benefits in pruritus treatment: development and validation of a specific outcomes tool. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161: 1143–1148.
  • Benjamin K, Waterston K, Russell M, Schofield O, Diffey B, Rees JL. The development of an objective method for measuring scratch in children with atopic dermatitis suitable for clinical use. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50: 33–40.
  • Bringhurst C, Waterston K, Schofield O, Benjamin K, Rees JL. Measurement of itch using actigraphy in pediatric and adult populations. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51: 893–898.
  • Hon KL, Chiu LS, Lam MC, Choi CL, Chan S, Luk NM. Measurement of pruritus in a Chinese woman with pemphigoid gestationis using a wrist movement detector. Int J Dermatol 2008; 47: 64–67.
  • Ebata T, Iwasaki S, Kamide R, Niimura M. Use of a wrist activity monitor for the measurement of nocturnal scratching in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2001; 144: 305–309.
  • Savin JA, Paterson WD, Oswald I. Scratching during sleep. Lancet 1973; 2: 296–297.
  • Aoki T, Kushimoto H, Hishikawa Y, Savin JA. Nocturnal scratching and its relationship to the disturbed sleep of itchy subjects. Clin Exp Dermatol 1991; 16: 268–272.
  • Endo K, Sumitsuji H, Fukuzumi T, Adachi J, Aoki T. Evaluation of scratch movements by a new scratch-monitor to analyze nocturnal itching in atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1997; 77: 432–435.
  • Mustakallio KK. Scratch radar for the measurement of pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl 1991; 156: 44.
  • Summerfield JA, Welch ME. The measurement of itch with sensitive limb movement meters. Br J Dermatol 1980; 103: 275–281.
  • Felix R, Shuster S. A new method for the measurement of itch and the response to treatment. Br J Dermatol 1975; 93: 303–312.
  • Ebata T, Aizawa H, Kamide R, Niimura M. The characteristics of nocturnal scratching in adults with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141: 82–86.
  • Talbot TL, Schmitt JM, Bergasa NV, Jones EA, Walker EC. Application of piezo film technology for the quantitative assessment of pruritus. Biomed Instrum Technol 1991; 25: 400–403.
  • Molenaar HA, Oosting J, Jones EA. Improved device for measuring scratching activity in patients with pruritus. Med Biol Eng Comput 1998; 36: 220–224.
  • Bijak M, Mayr W, Rafolt D, Tanew A, Unger E. Pruritometer 2: portable recording system for the quantification of scratching as objective criterion for the pruritus. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2001; 46: 137–141.
  • Stener-Victorin E, Lundeberg T, Kowalski J, Opdal L, Sjöström J, Lundeberg L. Perceptual matching for assessment of itch; reliability and responsiveness analyzed by a rank-invariant statistical method. J Invest Dermatol 2003; 121: 1301–1305.
  • Hägermark O, Wahlgren CF. Some methods for evaluating clinical itch and their application for studying pathophysiological mechanisms. J Dermatol Sci 1992; 4: 55–62.
  • Related articles

    There are no related articles.

    Share with your friends



    Full text



    There is no supplementary for this article.

    Print information

    Volume 92, Issue 5

    DOI: 10.2340/00015555-1246

    Pages: 502-507

    View at PubMed