Content » Vol 92, Issue 5

Investigative Report

Prevalence and Severity of Atopic Dermatitis in Jeju Island: A Cross-sectional Study of 4,028 Korean Elementary Schoolchildren by Physical Examination Utilizing the Three-item Severity Score

Dae Suk Kim1,2, Ju Hee Lee2, Kwang Hoon Lee2 and Min-Geol Lee2

1Branch of Jeju, Korean Hansen Welfare Association, Jeju Island, and 2Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

The objective of this study was to evaluate the precise prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) in schoolchildren in Jeju Island in South Korea examined in 2009. Nine elementary schools were randomly selected from Jeju Island and a total of 4,028 schoolchildren were examined by a dermatologist. AD was diagnosed based on the Korean Atopic Dermatitis Research Group criteria for the disease. The severity of AD was measured with the three-item severity score (TIS). The point prevalence of AD was 9.5% overall. The prevalence among higher graders (age 9–12 years) was significantly lower than that in lower graders (age 6–9 years) (7.5% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.00001). AD prevalence in girls (11.1%) was higher than that in boys (8.1%) (p < 0.005). In each grade, more than 50% of those affected had the mild form (TIS score 1 or 2). There were no apparent differences in severity of AD between grades or genders. This is the first Asian study of prevalence in schoolchildren using TIS score for evaluating AD severity. Key words: atopic dermatitis; elementary schoolchildren; Korean; prevalence; three-item severity score.

(Accepted April 10, 2012.)

Acta Derm Venereol 2012; 92: 472–474.

Min Geol Lee, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134 Sinchon-Dong, Seodaemoon-Gu, Seoul, South Korea. E-mail: stone4872@hanmail.net; mglee@yuhs.ac

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a relapsing inflammatory skin disease with genetic predispositions and environmental backgrounds. Questionnaire surveys and physical examination are major methods of evaluating the prevalence of AD. In English-speaking countries, the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire has been validated (1, 2). However, the prevalence rate of AD has revealed discrepancies between questionnaire and skin examination methods in non-English speaking populations (2). A recently published Korean AD prevalence study also highlighted the discrepancy, which is thought to be attributable to translation and cultural differences in questionnaire interpretation (3). Since the Korean version of the ISAAC questionnaire has not been validated, skin examination is still the most reliable method to evaluate the prevalence of AD in Korea.

Many different objective visual variables are used to measure AD severity. Most of these scoring systems are excellent for use in clinical trials, but too complicated and time-consuming for use in the routine clinical setting. The three-item severity (TIS) score, which was first presented by Wolkerstorfer et al. (4), is a simple scoring system preferred in epidemiological studies and in daily practice. The TIS score is easy and quick to obtain. Dirven-Meijer et al. (5) reported the prevalence of AD in children < 4 years in central Netherlands and estimated the severity of AD by using the TIS score. Although there is only one report measuring AD severity by TIS score, good correlation between the TIS score and SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis) has been shown (6, 7).

The prevalences of AD in Korean preschool children (3) and schoolchildren (8) have been estimated by clinical examination in 3 different areas of South Korea: Seoul, Ulsan and Chunchon. The objective of this study was to evaluate the precise prevalence and severity of AD using dermatologist’s physical examination for the first time in Jeju Island in South Korea.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects

The study was performed during the period June to November 2009. To avoid possible interobserver variation, all physical examinations were carried out by a single dermatologist (DSK). Nine elementary schools were selected randomly. Six schools from Jejusi (a district in the northern half of Jeju Island) and 3 schools from Seogwiposi (a district in the southern half of Jeju Island) were selected and all the schoolchildren were examined by the dermatologist. The target population was first to sixth graders (age range 6–12 years). A total of 4,028 Korean schoolchildren (2,092 boys and 1,936 girls) were evaluated.

Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis

AD was diagnosed based on the diagnostic criteria of the Korean Atopic Dermatitis Research Group (ADRG) (9). The Korean diagnostic criteria are the same as those of Hanafin & Rajka (10), but include 3 additional minor features (periauricular eczema, scalp scaling and skin-prick test reactivity).

The TIS score evaluates intensities of erythema (redness), oedema and excoriations (scratches). The TIS score is the sum of 3 intensity items, scored on a scale from 0 to 3. The highest possible TIS score is 9.

Data analysis

The χ2 test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’s t-test were used to analyse the results. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Prevalence of atopic dermatitis

A total of 4,028 schoolchildren (2,092 boys and 1,936 girls) were examined. The overall prevalence of AD in Jeju Island was 9.5% (Table I). The prevalence of AD in girls (11.1%) was higher than that in boys (8.1%) (p < 0.005). The prevalences of AD in first to sixth graders were 12.2%, 14.0%, 10.1%, 9.9%, 6.8% and 5.8%, respectively. The overall combined prevalence of AD in first, second and third graders was 11.9%, which was significantly higher than the combined prevalence among fourth, fifth and sixth graders (7.5%) (p < 0.00001). Thus the frequency of AD decreased with age, which is consistent with the results of other published studies (8, 11, 12). There was no apparent difference in the prevalence of AD in Jejusi and Seogwiposi (10.1% and 8.5%, respectively) (p > 0.05).

Table I. Prevalences of atopic dermatitis (AD) by grade and gender in elementary schoolchildren in Jeju Island

Grade

Boys

Girls

Total

Participants n

Patient with AD n (%)

Participants n

Patient with AD n (%)

Participants n

Patient with AD n (%)

First

287

33 (11.5)

256

33 (12.9)

543

66 (12.2)

Second

321

42 (13.1)

295

44 (14.9)

616

86 (14.0)

Third

315

30 (9.5)

326

35 (10.7)

641

65 (10.1)

Fourth

387

26 (6.7)

341

46 (13.5)

728

72 (9.9)

Fifth

363

17 (4.7)

348

31 (8.9)

711

48 (6.8)

Sixth

419

21 (5.0)

370

25 (6.8)

789

46 (5.8)

Total

2,092

169 (8.1)

1,936

214 (11.1)

4,028

383 (9.5)

Severity of atopic dermatitis

The mean total TIS score was 2.4 ± 1.5. Overall TIS scores of boys and girls were 2.3 ± 1.5 and 2.5 ± 1.5, respectively, with no significant difference (p > 0.2). The TIS score was not different between Jejusi and Seogwiposi (data not shown) (p > 0.1). In addition, the severity of AD was not different between grades (data not shown) (p > 0.1). Fig. 1 shows the number of schoolchildren with AD in each grade according to their TIS score. In each grade, the proportion of children with AD who scored 1 or 2 was > 50%, which suggests that the majority of schoolchildren with AD have a mild form of the disease.

Fig. 1. Number of patients per grade and three-item severity (TIS) score.

3736Fig1.tif

DISCUSSION

The overall prevalence of AD in Jeju Island was 9.5%, which was much smaller than the rate estimated by questionnaire studies (18.6–30.5%) (13). In contrast, Oh et al. (14) reported that the overall prevalence of AD in elementary schoolchildren in South Korea was 24.9% in a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. This discrepancy is due to several factors. First, as mentioned previously, validation of the Korean version of the ISAAC questionnaire has not been confirmed. Studies from Germany, Hong Kong and Ethiopia also showed discrepancies between prevalences since translated versions of the ISAAC questionnaires had not been thoroughly validated (15–17). Another factor is that the prevalence rate measured by skin examination is point prevalence, whereas the questionnaire studies measure period prevalence. In fact, previous Korean reports of AD prevalence, measured by skin examination, reveal a similar prevalence rate to that of our study (3, 8).

Compared with the results of studies from other countries, the prevalence of AD in Jeju Island (9.5%) is lower than that in Japanese (11.2%) and Australian (16.3%) studies (11, 12). This difference is probably due to genetic and environmental factors. Over the past few years, identification of loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding filaggrin has shed new light on disease mechanisms in AD (18). Further epidemiological studies investigating the association between genetic factors and AD are needed also in Korea.

Many previous reports have shown that AD is more common in industrialized areas than rural area (19). However, a nationwide study in Japan revealed no significant difference in prevalence between urban (10.9%) and rural areas (11.5%) (12). Since no urban areas were evaluated in this study, direct comparison between urban and rural areas was not possible. However, the AD prevalence rate in Korean children (9.2%), reported previously by Choi et al. (3), coincides with the AD prevalence rate in Jeju Island (9.5%). Choi et al.’s study (3) was performed in Seoul, which is one of the most crowded and industrialized cities in the world, with more than 20 million people living in its metropolitan area. In contrast, Jeju Island is one of the least crowded and ecologically most well-preserved regions in South Korea.

There was a significant difference in the prevalence of AD between boys and girls (8.1% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.005). Differences in hormonal systems, lifestyle, gender-specific hereditary components and skin physiology, or the fact that girls have more intrinsic AD, have been suggested as factors influencing the gender difference (20–24).

The severity of AD did not differ significantly between boys and girls. TIS score, classified as mild (< 3), moderate (3–5) or severe (6–9) showed mild AD in 67.9%, moderate AD in 26.6%, and severe AD in 5.5% of schoolchildren of both sexes in Jeju Island (6). Thus the majority of schoolchildren with AD had the mild form, which corresponds with previous reports from Australia and Japan (11, 12).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Jeju Special Self-Governing Provincial Office of Education and all the school principals, teachers and schoolchildren who participated in this study. We also thank Dong Hun Shin and Eun Joo Cho from KHWA for arranging and helping with the physical examinations.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

Included in the theme issue:

ATOPIC DERMATITIS, URTICARIA AND ITCH

Acta Derm Venereol 2012; 92: 449–581

  • Williams H, Robertson C, Stewart A, Ait-Khaled N, Anabwani G, Anderson R, et al. Worldwide variations in the prevalence of symptoms of atopic eczema in the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 103: 125–138.
  • Flohr C, Weinmayr G, Weiland SK, Addo-Yobo E, Annesi-Maesano I, Bjorkstein B, et al. How well do questionnaires perform compared with physical examination in detecting flexural eczema? Findings from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Phase Two. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161: 846–853.
  • Choi WJ, Ko JY, Kim JW, Lee KH, Park CW, Kim KH, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for atopic dermatitis: A cross-sectional study of 6,453 Korean preschool children. Acta Derm Venereol 2012; 92: 467–471.
  • Wolkerstorfer A, de Waard-van der Spek FB, Glazenburg EJ, Mulder PG, Oranje AP. Scoring the severity of atopic dermatitis: three item severity (TIS) score as a rough system for daily practice and as a prescreening tool for studies. Acta Derm Venereol 1999; 79: 356–359.
  • Dirven-Meijer PC, Glazenburg EJ, Mulder PGH, Oranje AP. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in children younger than 4 years in a demarcated area in central Netherlands: the West Veluwe Study Group. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158: 846–847.
  • Oranje AP, Glazenburg EJ, Wolkerstorfer A, de Waard-van der Spek FB. Practical issues on interpretation of scoring atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index, objective SCORAD and the three-item severity score. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157: 645–648.
  • Cosickic A, Skokic F, Colic-Hadzic B, Jahic M. Clinical characteristics and estimation severity of the atopic dermatitis in children. Med Arh 2010; 64: 178–182.
  • Kim CW, Park CJ, Kim JW, Koo DW, Kim KW, Kim TY. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Korea. Acta Derm Venereol 2000; 80: 353–356.
  • Park YL, Kim HD, Kim KH, Kim MN, Kim JW, Ro YS, et al. [Report from ADRG: A study on the diagnostic criteria of Korean atopic dermatitis.] Korean J Dermatol 2006; 44: 659–663 (in Korean).
  • Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1980; 92: 44–47.
  • Marks R, Kilkenny M, Plunkett A, Merlin K. The prevalence of common skin conditions in Australian school students: 2. Atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140: 468–473.
  • Saeki H, Iizuka H, Mori Y, Akasaka T, Takagi H, Kitajima Y. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Japanese elementary schoolchildren. Br J Dermatol 2005; 152: 110–114.
  • Bae JM, Shin KS. Estimating the prevalence of atopic dermatitis in school students in Jejudo, Korea. J Prev Med Public Health 2009; 42: 171–176.
  • Oh JW, Pyun BY, Choung JT, Ahn KM, Kim CH, Song SW, et al. Epidemiological change of atopic dermatitis and food allergy in school-aged children in Korea between 1995 and 2000. J Korean Med Sci 2004; 19: 716–723.
  • Kramer U, Schafer T, Behrendt H, Ring J. The influence of cultural and educational factors on the validity of symptoms and diagnosis questions for atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138: 1040–1046.
  • Chan HH, Pei A, Van Krevel C, Wong GWK, Lai CKW. Validation of Chinese translated version of ISAAC core questions for atopic eczema. Clin Exp Allergy 2001; 31: 903–907.
  • Haileamlak A, Lewis SA, Britton J, Venn AJ, Woldermariam D, Hubbard R, et al. Validation of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Children (ISAAC) and U.K. criteria for atopica eczema in Ethiopian children. Br J Dermatol 2005; 152: 735–741.
  • O’Regan GM, Sandilands A, McLean WHI, Irvine AD. Filaggrin in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 122: 689–693.
  • Poysa L, Korppi M, Pietikainen M, Remes K, Juntunen-Backman K. Asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic eczema in Finnish children and adolescents. Allergy 1991; 46: 161–165.
  • Eriksson-Lihr Z. Special features in allergy in children. Acta Allergol 1955; 8: 289–313.
  • Mohrenschlager M, Schafer T, Huss-Marp J, Eberlein-Konig B, Weidinger S, Ring J et al. The course of eczema in children aged 5–7 years and its relation to atopy: differences between boys and girls. Br J Dermatol 2006; 154: 505–513.
  • Melen E, Kere J, Pershagen G, Svartengren M, Wickman M. Influence of male sex and parental allergic disease on childhood wheezing: role of interactions. Clin Exp Allergy 2004; 34: 839–844.
  • Yang KD, Lin CA, Chang JC, Chuang H, Ou CY, Hsu TY, et al. Polymorphism of the immune-braking gene CTLA-4 (+49) involved in gender discrepancy of serum total IgE levels and allergic disease. Clin Exp Allergy 2004; 34: 32–37.
  • Seidenari S, Giusti G, Bertoni L, Magnoni C, Pellacani G. Thickness and echogenicity of the skin in children as assessed by 20-MHz ultrasound. Dermatology 2000; 201: 218–222.