Content » Vol 96, Issue 5

Investigative Report

Immune-mediated Skin Inflammation is Similar in Severe Atopic Dermatitis Patients With or Without Filaggrin Mutation

Zsolt Dajnoki1,2, Gabriella Béke1, 2, Gábor Mócsai1,2, Anikó Kapitány1,2, Krisztián Gáspár1,2, Krisztina Hajdu1,2, Gabriella Emri2, Bence Nagy3, Ilona Kovács3, Lívia Beke3, Balázs Dezső3 and Andrea Szegedi1,2

1Division of Dermatological Allergology, Departments of 2Dermatology and 3Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary

Inflammatory cytokines can impair the skin barrier, but the question as to whether barrier alterations affect keratinocyte immune responses remains unanswered. The aim of this study was to investigate whether immune-mediated skin inflammation differs between severe atopic dermatitis patients with or without filaggrin mutation. The levels of filaggrin, inflammatory T helper 2 polarizing cytokines (thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and interleukin 33 (IL-33)) and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 27 (CCL27), histological severity markers, T-cell and dendritic cell counts in biopsies from lesional skin of severe atopic dermatitis patients with and without filaggrin mutation and healthy skin were quantified by immunohistochemistry. The results were confirmed by quantitative PCR analyses. No significant differences were found between the 2 patient groups. Expression of atopic dermatitis-specific cytokines showed significant correlation with histological severity. These findings suggest that the immune-mediated skin inflammation (represented by keratinocyte-derived factors, T-cell and dendritic cell counts) is similar in the 2 patient groups with severe atopic dermatitis, and that immune activation is connected to the severity of the disease rather than to the origin of barrier alterations. Key words: atopic dermatitis; filaggrin; immunohistochemistry; innate immunity; thymic stromal lymphopoietin.

Accepted Oct 29, 2015; Epub ahead of print Nov 5, 2015

Acta Derm Venereol 2016; 96: XX–XX.

Andrea Szegedi, Division of Dermatological Allergology, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 98. Nagyerdei krt, HU-4032 Debrecen, Hungary. E-mail: aszegedi@med.unideb.hu

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease, which is often accompanied by other allergic diseases and impaired quality of life (1–5). Previous studies have shown that AD is a Th2-mediated disease and have revealed the simultaneous presence of T-helper 1 (Th1) and Th22 cells in the chronic phase of skin inflammation (6). In addition to the altered adaptive immune functions, dysregulated innate immune and skin barrier mechanisms have also been studied (7–9). A growing body of evidence supports the hypothesis that keratinocytes (KCs) can enhance inflammatory responses in AD (10–13) by producing a unique profile of cytokines and chemokines (thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interleukin (IL)-33, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 27 (CCL27)) and, in the last decade, the role of KCs in the background of skin barrier dysfunction has also been highly emphasized (8).

Filaggrin (FLG) is a skin barrier structural protein in the granular and corneal layers of the skin. Common (R501X and 2282del4) as well as rare (S3247X, R2447X and 3702delG) FLG null mutations are crucial predisposing factors for AD (14–16). On the other hand, inflammatory cytokine and chemokine milieu can also impair the skin barrier in severe AD, leading to acquired FLG loss by down-regulating the gene expression of FLG and profilaggrin-processing enzymes (4, 17). Skin barrier function can be equally impaired in patients with severe AD irrespective of FLG haploinsufficiency or acquired FLG deficiency (18, 19). However, no study has investigated whether KC innate immune functions differ between patients with genetic FLG loss and patients with acquired FLG decrease.

The aim of this study was to compare the KC innate immune functions, and T-cell and dendritic cell (DC) counts in the lesional skin of patients with severe AD with genetic or acquired FLG loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lesional skin biopsies were collected from 24 Caucasian patients with severe extrinsic type of AD (20) and from 5 healthy controls. Two groups were formed according to their FLG genotype: patients with severe symptoms without FLG mutations (Wt) (n = 12) and patients with severe symptoms with FLG mutation (n = 12) (Table I). 5–5 samples in both groups were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and 12–12 samples were analysed by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Detailed patient information is given in Appendix S11.

Table I. Clinical characteristics and quantitative PCR (qPCR) data of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) Significant differences were found between the 2 AD groups in total IgE levels and frequency of sensitization (*p < 0.05). Other parameters did not differ significantly. There were no AD patients with compound heterozygous mutation of filaggrin (FLG). qPCR data are presented as gene expression relative to controls. No significant differences were detected between the 2 AD groups

 

FLG Wt severe AD n=12

FLG Mutant severe AD n=12

FLG mutation

2282del4

0/12

2282del4

9/12

R501x

0/12

R501x

3/12

Age, years, mean ± SD

21 ± 9.98

12.8 ± 7.85

Age at onset, month, mean ± SD

37 ± 41.8

5 ± 7.7

SCORAD, mean ± SD

44.8 ± 8.28

42.6 ± 6.3

Blood eosinophil count, %, mean ± SD

0.87 ± 0.57

0.82 ± 0.53

TEWL, g/m2/h, mean ± SD

 

 

Non-lesional skin

29.76 ± 10.59

26.2 ± 12.93

Lesional skin

43.31 ± 4.52

42.39 ± 9.97

Serum total IgE, kU/l*, mean ± SD

2,813.9 ± 1,750.3

8,313.7 ± 6,624.8

Sensitization proven by prick test*

6/12

12/12

qPCR results, mean ± SEM

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin

0.51 ± 0.21

0.55 ± 0.14

IL-33

0.10 ± 0.049

0.06 ± 0.008

CCL27

1.87 ± 0.57

1.76 ± 0.64

SCORAD: SCORing Atopic Dermatits; TEWL: transepidermal water loss; SD: standard deviation; SEM: standard error of the mean.

Analysis of the FLG mutations R501X and 2282del4 (21, 22) was performed for all patients as previously described (18). A detailed protocol is given in Appendix S11.

Paraffin-embedded sections were stained with antibodies against human FLG, Ki67, TSLP, IL-33, CCL27, CD3 and CD11c. The slides were digitalized and analysed by using Pannoramic Viewer 1.15.2 (3DHistech Ltd, Budapest, Hungary) software. Detailed protocols are available in Appendix S11.

Total RNA was isolated and quantified according to the manufacturer’s protocol, which are available in Appendix S11.

To determine the statistical significance between the 3 groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Newman-Keuls post test were used. Differences between the groups were demonstrated using mean ± 95% confidence interval. Analysis of correlations was performed by Pearson r test. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Detection of severity markers in the skin of wild type and filaggrin mutant severe atopic dermatitis patients

The quantification of 2 histological severity markers, namely the measurement of epidermal thickness (ET) (not shown) and the detection of Ki67-positive cells (Fig. 1b), was performed. No differences were found in the levels of these parameters between the 2 AD groups (ET: MEAN Wt AD= 159.4 µm; MEAN FLG Mutant AD=176.7 µm), but compared with controls ET (HC vs. Wt AD: p < 0.001; HC vs. Mutant AD: p < 0.001) and Ki67 expression levels (HC vs. Wt AD: p < 0.001; HC vs. Mutant AD: p < 0.001) were significantly higher in both AD groups. These data corresponded to an almost identical clinical severity (OSCORAD) of the patients.

Immunohistochemistry analyses of keratinocyte-derived cytokines, chemokine and filaggrin in the skin of wild type and filaggrin mutant severe atopic dermatitis patients

To demonstrate FLG loss in the skin of the patient groups, immunostaining of FLG was performed. No difference was found between the levels of FLG in the skin of the 2 patient groups and the protein levels were significantly lower compared with controls (HC vs. Wt AD: p < 0.001; HC vs. Mutant AD: p < 0.001) (Fig. 1a). In AD skin, FLG could be detected discontinuously with mild positivity; in contrast, FLG was found continually with strong positivity in the granular layer of normal skin. Quantification of KC-derived proinflammatory cytokines thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and IL-33 and chemokine CCL27 was also carried out. The levels of the 2 proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines were significantly higher in the skin of patients with AD than in the control group, but no differences were found between the 2 AD groups (Fig. 1c, d, e) (HC TSLP vs. Wt AD TSLP: p < 0.05; HC TSLP vs. Mutant AD TSLP: p < 0.01; HC IL-33 vs. Wt AD IL-33: p < 0.01; HC IL-33 vs. Mutant AD IL-33: p < 0.01; HC CCL27 vs. Wt AD CCL27: p < 0.001; HC CCL27 vs. Mutant AD CCL27: p < 0.001). It is important to note that TSLP was only slightly detectable, or not detectable, in control skin. Cytoplasmic positivity of TSLP in AD skin showed decreasing intensity from the granular layer towards the basal membrane in the epidermis. Strong IL-33 nuclear positivity was observed above the basal membrane in 2–5 cell layers in AD skin. It was expressed moderately in the normal skin of healthy control subjects, but only in basal KCs. CCL27 expression 2–3 cell layers below the granular layer was detectable in control skin samples, but was significantly higher in the AD groups.

Detection of thymic stromal lymphopoietin, IL-33 and CCL27 mRNA levels in the skin of wild type and filaggrin mutant severe atopic dermatitis patients

Regarding all the 3 investigated parameters, no significant differences could be detected in mRNA levels between the 2 AD groups (Table I). Comparing the healthy control group with the AD groups, difference could be found only regarding IL-33 mRNA levels.

T cells and dendritic cells in the skin of wild type and filaggrin mutant severe atopic dermatitis patients

CD3+ T cells (Fig. 1f) and CD11c+ DCs (Fig. 1g) were also immunostained. The number of T cells (HC vs. Wt AD: p < 0.001; HC vs. Mutant AD: p < 0.001) and DCs (HC vs. Wt AD: p < 0.001; HC vs. Mutant AD: p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the skin of patients with AD compared with the skin of healthy controls, but there were no differences between the skin of the 2 AD groups.

Fig. 1. Expression of (a) filaggrin (FLG), (b) Ki67, (c) thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), (d) interleukin 33 (IL-33), (e) chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 27 (CCL27), (f) CD3 and (g) CD11c in normal, Wt severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and FLG mutant severe atopic dermatitis (AD) skin. No difference was found between the severe AD groups with regard to all measured parameters. (a) FLG level was significantly decreased in AD groups compared with controls (1a); all of the other investigated parameters ((b) Ki67, (c) TSLP, (d) IL-33, (e) CCL27, (f) CD3+T cells, (g) CD11c+DCs) were expressed in significantly higher amounts in the skin of patients with AD. Graphs show the mean ± 95% confidence interval of measured protein levels. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

4562fig1.tif

Correlations between histological severity markers and keratinocyte-derived cytokines and chemokine, T-cell and dendritic cell counts

Since no differences were found with regard to the measured parameters between the 2 AD groups, all data for patients with AD were pooled together and immune cell counts and levels of KC-derived cytokines and chemokine were correlated with ET, Ki67 expression and FLG contents. Statistically significant correlations were found between Ki67 and TSLP levels (p = 0.0226; Pearson r = 0.7058) (Fig. 2a), between Ki67 and CCL27 levels (p = 0.0138; Pearson r = 0.7769) (Fig. 2b), between ET and IL-33 levels (p = 0.0430; Spearman r = 0.7222) (Fig. 2c) and between ET and CD3+ cell count (p = 0.0164; Spearman r = 0.7645) (Fig. 2d). No correlations were observed between histological severity markers and DC count and between FLG levels and severity markers or T-cell and DC counts and between OSCORAD and our investigated parameters (not shown).

10799.png

Fig. 2. Correlation between histological severity markers (Ki67, epidermal thickness (ET)), T-cell count and levels of keratinocyte (KC)-derived cytokines and chemokines. Statistically significant correlations were found (a) between Ki67 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) levels (p = 0.0226; Pearson r = 0.7058), (b) between Ki67 and CCL27 levels (p = 0.0138; Pearson r = 0.7769), (c) between ET and interleukin 33 (IL-33) levels (p = 0.0430; Pearson r = 0.7222) and (d) between ET and CD3+ cell count (p = 0.0164; Pearson r = 0.7645). Analysis of correlations was performed by Pearson r test.

DISCUSSION

AD is a multifactorial immune-mediated inflammation of the skin that is driven by interactions of genetic and environmental factors (23). Over-reactive adaptive, dysregulated innate immune responses and impaired skin barrier functions together lead to the manifestation of the disease (24). FLG, a crucial component of the physicochemical skin barrier, shows several genetic alterations (e.g. copy number variations and FLG null mutations) and, together with other less studied barrier gene mutations (KLK7, SPINK5 and Claudin-1), can predispose to AD (9). On the other hand, acquired barrier dysfunctions can be caused by the frequent usage of detergents and exposure to allergens and Staphylococcus (25), as well as by local skin inflammation (18). The question as to whether genetic or acquired skin barrier dysfunctions can alter KC immune function differently has not been raised.

The aim of this study was to determine whether immune-mediated skin inflammation (KC function, T-cell and DC count) differs between severe AD patients with or without FLG mutations. We also investigated the correlations between histological severity markers, FLG content, KC-derived cytokine and chemokine levels and T-cell and DC counts. In order to answer our questions, 2 patient groups were created: FLG Wt patients and FLG mutant patients with severe symptoms and matching OSCORAD. Two parameters, ET and Ki67 expression, were investigated to score histological severity (25–29). Significantly thickened epidermis and elevated Ki67 levels were found in the 2 AD groups compared with controls, whereas no differences were observed between the 2 severe AD groups irrespective of their FLG genotype.

Although serum IgE levels and frequency of sensitization were significantly higher in the FLG mutant AD group, the clinical and histological severity were the same, and no difference was found in the epidermal FLG content. These findings are in concordance with our previous results, as the level of FLG loss is connected to the severity of the skin inflammation, rather than to the cause of FLG loss, while IgE level and sensitization seem to be connected to FLG genotype with significantly increased levels in FLG mutant AD (18).

To study whether immune functions of KCs differ between severe AD patients with or without FLG mutations, TSLP, IL-33 and CCL27 tissue levels were compared. In the last few years, the importance of TSLP in AD has been highlighted. TSLP is produced by KCs and is known for its capacity to induce CD11c+ myeloid DCs to promote Th2-skewed inflammatory responses. Previous studies have shown significantly elevated serum (30, 31), epidermal (32, 33) and stratum corneum (34) TSLP levels in AD compared with controls, while other groups failed to detect higher serum TSLP levels in these patients. The intensity of expression in the stratum corneum correlated with clinical severity (34), while, on the contrary, the relationships between serum and epidermal TSLP levels and OSCORAD were highly controversial (18, 30, 31). In parallel with previous data in the literature (31, 32), we found significantly higher epidermal TSLP levels in patients with AD than in controls; according to our results, TSLP protein levels did not differ between Wt and FLG mutant AD groups. In our study, epidermal TSLP levels correlated significantly with the level of the histological severity marker Ki67, but no relationship was found between TSLP levels and clinical severity.

IL-33, a newly discovered AD-specific cytokine, is expressed by epithelial cells and activates Th2 lympho­cytes, mast cells and eosinophils (35). Our results showed that IL-33 protein expression was significantly elevated in the AD groups compared with controls and no significant difference was found in IL-33 protein levels between the Wt and FLG mutant AD patients. These data correspond to a previous investigation, which found IL-33 protein expression to be up-regulated in the lesional skin of patients with AD (35), although the comparison of FLG mutant and Wt AD groups was not performed in that study. In another investigation, a correlation was found between serum IL-33 levels and disease severity of AD (36). Our group found a strong correlation between ET and levels of epidermal IL-33 protein, but failed to detect any relationship between clinical disease severity and epidermal IL-33 levels.

CCL27 is a skin-specific CC chemokine produced by KCs, which contributes to tissue-restricted leukocyte trafficking and can induce inflammation by promoting the migration of Th2 cells into the skin (37). A previous study described strong CCL27 expression in lesional keratinocytes of patients with AD by using IHC (38). Similarly, we also found significantly elevated protein levels of CCL27 in AD skin, but when Wt and FLG mutant AD groups were compared, no difference was detected. Serum CCL27 level was found to correlate significantly with OSCORAD in patients with AD by a Japanese group (38), but no data have been published about the relationship between the epidermal levels of CCL27 and disease severity. Significantly correlated expression levels of CCL27 and Ki67 were found by our group, but no relationship could be detected between tissue CCL27 levels and OSCORAD.

Our IHC results were also confirmed by qPCR analyses, since TSLP, IL-33 and CCL27 mRNA levels were similar in the 2 AD groups. In the literature no qPCR data can be found comparing FLG mutant and WT AD groups regarding these parameters, but a recent RNA sequencing investigation could indirectly strengthen our results, as these cytokines were not published in the list of differentially expressed (fold change ≥ 2 and p < 0.05) genes (39). Comparing healthy controls with patients with AD, mRNA levels did not reflect the detected protein levels. This contrast can be explained by post-transcriptional modification, namely the regulation of mRNA degradation and translation by enzymes and micro RNAs, which depends on the actual state of the keratinocytes and systemic needs. To date, only 2 articles have been published on the mRNA levels of TSLP and IL-33 (31, 35) and none on CCL27 gene expression in patients with AD. The differences found in the relationship between the clinical and histological severity markers and KC-derived proinflammatory cytokines (TSLP, IL-33) and chemokine (CCL27) highlights the fact that using OSCORAD is not always parallel to the degree of inflammation in a given plaque; therefore, the local immune markers of inflammation presumably show better correlation with a local severity marker than a complete skin severity marker.

Since the aforesaid cytokines and chemokine produced by KCs have an effect on T cells and DCs (10), their cell counts were assayed. In our investigation, similar to a previous study (40), the number of T cells and DCs were found to be significantly higher in the skin of patients with severe AD compared with the skin of healthy controls. We found no significant differences between the immune cell numbers of FLG mutant and Wt AD patient groups. We also detected a strong correlation between ET and CD3+ T-cell count. On the other hand, DC count showed no direct connection with AD histological severity markers and our workgroup did not find any correlation between FLG content and all of the investigated parameters.

In conclusion, our results suggest that immune-mediated skin inflammation, represented by innate and adaptive immune cell counts and KC-derived cytokine and chemokine content, does not differ between severe AD patients with acquired or genetically determined FLG loss. This may indicate that genetic FLG mutation in KCs does not influence the immune function of these cells in a different manner. The results of the correlations demonstrated that immune activation in the skin is connected to the severity of the disease rather than to the origin of barrier alterations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Hungarian Research Grant (OTKA K108421), TÁMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0023-”DEFENSE-NET” (implemented by the New Hungary Development Plan co-financed by European Social Fund and European Regional Development Fund) and University of Debrecen RH-885/2013).

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

10705.png

1http://www.medicaljournals.se/acta/content/?doi=10.2340/00015555-2272

REFERENCES

 

1. Beattie PE, Lewis-Jones MS. A comparative study of impairment of quality of life in children with skin disease and children with other chronic childhood diseases. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155: 145–151.

2. Ober C, Yao TC. The genetics of asthma and allergic disease: a 21st century perspective. Immunol Rev 2011; 242: 10–30.

3. Spergel JM, Paller AS. Atopic dermatitis and the atopic march. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 112: S118–127.

4. Howell MD, Kim BE, Gao P, Grant AV, Boguniewicz M, DeBenedetto A, et al. Cytokine modulation of atopic dermatitis filaggrin skin expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 124: R7–R12.

5. Chen YC, Wu CS, Lu YW, Li WC, Ko YC, Yu HS et al. Atopic dermatitis and non-atopic hand eczema have similar negative impacts on quality of life: implications for clinical significance. Acta Derm Venereol 2013; 93: 749–750.

6. Werfel T. The role of leukocytes, keratinocytes, and allergen-specific IgE in the development of atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129: 1878–1891.

7. McGirt LY, Beck LA. Innate immune defects in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 118: 202–208.

8. De Benedetto A, Agnihothri R, McGirt LY, Bankova LG, Beck LA. Atopic dermatitis: a disease caused by innate immune defects? J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129: 14–30.

9. Boguniewicz M, Leung DY. Atopic dermatitis: a disease of altered skin barrier and immune dysregulation. Immunol Rev 2011; 242: 233–246.

10. Wittmann M, Werfel T. Interaction of keratinocytes with infiltrating lymphocytes in allergic eczematous skin diseases. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 6: 329–334.

11. Holgate ST. The epithelium takes centre stage in asthma and atopic dermatitis. Trends Immunol 2007; 28: 248–251.

12. Wolf R, Wolf D. Abnormal epidermal barrier in the patho­genesis of atopic dermatitis. Clin Dermatol 2012; 30: 329–334.

13. Elias PM, Schmuth M. Abnormal skin barrier in the etiopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 9: 437–446.

14. Irvine AD, McLean WH, Leung DY. Filaggrin mutations associated with skin and allergic diseases. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1315–1327.

15. Palmer CN, Irvine AD, Terron-Kwiatkowski A, Zhao Y, Liao H, Lee SP, et al. Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 441–446.

16. Smith FJ, Irvine AD, Terron-Kwiatkowski A, Sandilands A, Campbell LE, Zhao Y, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding filaggrin cause ichthyosis vulgaris. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 337–342.

17. O’Regan GM, Sandilands A, McLean WH, Irvine AD. Filaggrin in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 122: 689–693.

18. Mocsai G, Gaspar K, Nagy G, Irinyi B, Kapitany A, Biro T, et al. Severe skin inflammation and filaggrin mutation similarly alter the skin barrier in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2014; 170: 617–624.

19. Winge MC. Atopic dermatitis severity and skin barrier impairment. Br J Dermatol 2014; 170: 490–491.

20. Akdis CA, Akdis M. Immunological differences between intrinsic and extrinsic types of atopic dermatitis. Clinical and experimental allergy. J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 33: 1618–1621.

21. O’Regan GM, Sandilands A, McLean WH, Irvine AD. Filaggrin in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 124: R2–6.

22. Sandilands A, Sutherland C, Irvine AD, McLean WH. Filaggrin in the frontline: role in skin barrier function and disease. J Cell Sci 2009; 122: 1285–1294.

23. Bussmann C, Weidinger S, Novak N. Genetics of atopic dermatitis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2011; 9: 670–676.

24. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. Ann Dermatol 2010; 22: 125–137.

25. Son ED, Kim HJ, Park T, Shin K, Bae IH, Lim KM et al. Staphylococcus aureus inhibits terminal differentiation of normal human keratinocytes by stimulating interleukin-6 secretion. J Dermatol Sci 2014; 74: 64–71.

26. Al-Jaberi H, Marks R. Studies of the clinically uninvolved skin in patients with dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 1984; 111: 437–443.

27. Jensen JM, Folster-Holst R, Baranowsky A, Schunck M, Winoto-Morbach S, Neumann C, et al. Impaired sphingomyelinase activity and epidermal differentiation in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2004; 122: 1423–1431.

28. Zhou J, Chen Y, Huang Y, Long J, Wan F, Zhang S. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone level is associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 and Ki67 expression in post-menopausal females with breast cancer. Oncol Lett 2013; 6: 1128–1132.

29. Kawahira K. Immunohistochemical staining of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in malignant and nonmalignant skin diseases. Arch Dermatol Res 1999; 291: 413–418.

30. Lee EB, Kim KW, Hong JY, Jee HM, Sohn MH, Kim KE. Increased serum thymic stromal lymphopoietin in children with atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2010; 21: e457–460.

31. Alysandratos KD, Angelidou Aea. Increased affected skin gene expression and serum levels of thymic stromal lymphopoietin in atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2010; 105: 403–404.

32. Soumelis V, Reche PA, Kanzler H, Yuan W, Edward G, Homey B, et al. Human epithelial cells trigger dendritic cell mediated allergic inflammation by producing TSLP. Nat Immunol 2002; 3: 673–680.

33. He R, Geha RS. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1183: 13–24.

34. Sano Y, Masuda K, Tamagawa-Mineoka R, Matsunaka H, Murakami Y, Yamashita R, et al. Thymic stromal lympho­poietin expression is increased in the horny layer of patients with atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Immunol 2013; 171: 330–337.

35. Savinko T, Matikainen S, Saarialho-Kere U, Lehto M, Wang G, Lehtimaki S, et al. IL-33 and ST2 in atopic dermatitis: expression profiles and modulation by triggering factors. J Invest Dermatol 2012; 132: 1392–1400.

36. Tamagawa-Mineoka R, Okuzawa Y, Masuda K, Katoh N. Increased serum levels of interleukin 33 in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 70: 882–888.

37. Homey B, Wang W, Soto H, Buchanan ME, Wiesenborn A, Catron D, et al. Cutting edge: the orphan chemokine receptor G protein-coupled receptor-2 (GPR-2, CCR10) binds the skin-associated chemokine CCL27 (CTACK/ALP/ILC). J Immunol 2000; 164: 3465–3470.

38. Kakinuma T, Saeki H, Tsunemi Y, Fujita H, Asano N, Mitsui H, et al. Increased serum cutaneous T cell-attracting chemokine (CCL27) levels in patients with atopic dermatitis and psoriasis vulgaris. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111: 592–597.

39. Cole C, Kroboth K, Schurch NJ, Sandilands A, Sherstnev A, O’Regan GM, et al. Filaggrin-stratified transcriptomic analysis of pediatric skin identifies mechanistic pathways in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 134: 82–91.

40. Guttman-Yassky E, Lowes MA, Fuentes-Duculan J, Whynot J, Novitskaya I, Cardinale I, et al. Major differences in inflammatory dendritic cells and their products distinguish atopic dermatitis from psoriasis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 119: 1210–1217.

Supplementary content
Appendix S1