Content » Vol 94, Issue 2

Short communication

Localized Cutaneous Amyloidosis Associated with Poikilodermatous Mycosis Fungoides

Kentaro Izumi, Ken Arita, Keita Horie, Daichi Hoshina and Hiroshi Shimizu

Department of Dermatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, N15 W7, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan. E-mail: izumi55kentaro@yahoo.co.jp

Accepted Apr 4, 2013; Epub ahead of print Jul 4, 2013

Secondary localized cutaneous amyloidosis (LCA) occurs in association with skin inflammatory disorders or around various epithelial tumours. We describe here a case of LCA in association with generalized, patch-stage mycosis fungoides (MF).

CASE REPORT

A 68-year-old man had had pruritic scaly eruptions on the trunk and extremities for 54 years. He had not received any medical treatment for his eruptions before he visited our department. He had no history of serious illness. Initial examination revealed diffuse atrophic erythema with pityriatic scales on the trunk and extremities (Fig. 1). Hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation and telangiectasia were also intermingled with the erythema. A biopsy specimen from his left thigh revealed band-like lymphocytic infiltration in the papillary dermis (Fig. 2a). Epidermotropism and Pautrier’s microabscesses were also observed (data not shown). In some areas, focal interface vacuolar changes were evident, with associated pigment incontinence in the biopsy specimen (Fig. 2b). The infiltrating lymphocytes were positive for CD3 (Fig. 2c), CD4 (Fig. 2d), and CD8 (Fig. 2e). The population of CD8+ cells predominated over that of CD4+ cells.

In addition, amorphous eosinophilic deposits were present in the papillary dermis and around the adnexal, surrounded by lymphocytes infiltration (Fig. 2a; asterisk). The deposits were positive for direct fast scarlet (Fig. 2f). We also performed Congo red staining, and the deposits were negative for this staining (data not shown). Therefore, we checked the polarizing microscopic findings with the specimens stained by direct fast scarlet, and this staining revealed green birefringence (Fig. 2g), therefore we finally considered these deposits as amyloid-like materials. Immunohistochemical staining for keratin antibody (34βE12 (which reacts with cytokeratin (CK) 1, 5, 10, 14), CK5/6, CK7, CK8, CK13, CK14, CK18, CK19 and CK20) was performed, and positive staining was observed for 34βE12 (Fig. 2h) and CK5/6 (Fig. 2i).

Fig. 1. Diffuse atrophic erythema, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation and telangiectasia on the patient’s trunk.

3976fig1.tif

Fig. 2. A skin biopsy specimen from the left thigh shows band-like lymphocytic infiltration in the superficial dermis. (a) Amorphous eosinophilic deposits (asterisks) are observed in the superficial dermis. Haematoxylin-eosin stain, original magnification × 40. (b) In some areas, focal interface vacuolar changes associated with pigment incontinence are observed. Haematoxylin-eosin stain, original magnification × 200. (c–e) Infiltrating lymphocytes are positive for (c) CD3, (d) CD4, and (e) CD8 (original magnification × 40). (f) The amorphous deposits are positive for direct fast scarlet, and (g) polarizing microscopic findings of these deposits reveal green birefringence (original magnification × 100). The amorphous deposits are positive for (h) 34βE12 and (i) CK5/6 (original magnification × 100).

3976fig2.tif

Whole-body computed tomography (CT) scanning and Ga-67 scintigraphy did not reveal the involvement of MF in the lymph nodes or internal organs, nor any abnormalities suggesting systemic amyloidosis. The results of blood tests for cell counts and chemistry panel were within normal ranges, and M-protein was not detected. We diagnosed this case as LCA associated with poikilodermatous MF. The patient was treated with topical steroid and psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA), and his skin manifestations improved gradually.

DISCUSSION

LCA can be observed both primarily and secondarily. Secondary LCA occurs in various inflammatory skin diseases and epithelial skin tumours. The amyloid in the LCA is mainly derived from epidermal keratins. The keratin from damaged keratinocytes drops off to the dermis and is degenerated to form amyloid materials. Amyloid deposits are usually positive with Congo red staining and green birefringence by polarizing micro­scopy. In polarized light the deposits of our case revealed green birefringence after staining with direct fast scarlet, but the deposits were negative for Congo red staining. This discrepancy between direct fast scarlet and Congo red staining may result from an amount of amyloid deposits, because Congo red staining may be equivocal and inadequate for detecting small deposits of amyloid, such as LCA (1). Chang et al. (2) investigated the cytokeratin profiles in LCA in detail. The amyloid material in secondary LCA positively stained in 34βE12 and CK5 in 100% of cases analysed in the research. The data support the theory that amyloid materials are generated by epidermal damage.

There have been only 2 cases of LCA associated with MF (3, 4). One was the patch stage and the other was the plaque stage of MF, and both cases had pruritus, similar to our case. The former case showed positive immunohistochemical staining for keratin antibody (AE1/AE3 (reacts with CK1-8, 10, 14–16, 19)) on the amyloid deposition (3). In latter case, staining of lymphocytic markers was performed and the infiltrating lymphocytes were positive for CD3 and CD4 (4).

In our case, the clinical and histological features were consistent with poikilodermatous MF. Poikilodermatous MF is a clinical variant of MF that is characterized by earlier age of onset, longer duration of clinical symptoms before diagnosis and predominance of the CD8+ phenotype (5). Vacuolar degeneration, interface dermatitis and pigment incontinence are commonly seen in poikilodermatous MF. CD8+ cells are cytotoxic in nature; therefore, the infiltration of the many CD8+ cells in our case might be attributable to the formation of amyloid material from attacks on epidermal keratinocytes. A possible alternative mechanism of amyloid formation in this case is amyloid formation through prolonged scratching and rubbing, like that of friction amyloidosis. However, the amyloid deposition was seen around the hair follicles, suggesting that the amyloid formation was not solely the result of external stimulus. We performed detailed immunostaining of keratins, and positivity was seen in 34βE12 and CK5/6. This suggests that the mechanism of amyloid generation in MF may be similar to those of the other skin conditions that are associated with secondary LCA. This is the first report to demonstrate that the amyloid seen in MF lesions is positive for CK5/6.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Breathnach S.M. Amyloid and the amyloidoses of the skin. In: Tony B, editor. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology, 8th edn. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2010: p. 59.42.

2. Chang YT, Liu HN, Wang WJ, Lee DD, Tsai SF. A study of cytokeratin profiles in localized cutaneous amyloidosis. Arch Dermatol Res 2004; 296: 83–88.

3. Romero LS, Kantor GR, Levin MW, Vonderheid EC. Localized cutaneous amyloidosis associated with mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37: 124–127.

4. Sangueza JM, Saenz ML. Disseminated dermatosis with pruritic plaques and patches. Am J Dermatopathol 2006; 28: 178–180.

5. Abbott RA, Sahni D, Robson A, Agar N, Whittaker S, Scarisbrick JJ. Poikilodermatous mycosis fungoides: A study of its clinicopathological, immunophenotypic, and prognostic features. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65: 313–319.