Content » Vol 95, Issue 6

Short communication

Five-day Azithromycin Treatment Regimen for Mycoplasma genitalium Infection Also Effectively Eradicates Chlamydia trachomatis

Magnus Unemo1, Kim M. A. Endre2 and Harald Moi2*

1WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and other STIs, National Reference Laboratory for Pathogenic Neisseria, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden, and 2Olafia Clinic, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, NO-0506 Oslo, Norway. *E-mail: harald.moi@medisin.uio.no

Accepted Mar 26, 2015; Epub ahead of print Mar 30, 2015

Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium are the most frequent aetiologies of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) (1–3). There are no international management guidelines for M. genitalium infections. The recommended first-line treatments in NGU and C. trachomatis management guidelines are doxycycline, 100 mg twice daily for 7 days (oral), or azithromycin, 1 g stat (oral) (2, 3). Both these European guidelines are currently under revision. Doxycycline effectively eradicates chlamydial infection; however, it has a low eradication rate for M. genitalium infection (1, 4–6). With azithromycin 1 g, the eradication rate of M. genitalium has significantly decreased during recent years due to rapid emergence of resistance (1, 4, 6–8). Furthermore, treatment failures in > 5% of patients treated for chlamydial infection with azithromycin 1 g have raised concerns (8–10). Homotypic azithromycin resistance in C. trachomatis has never been verified. Instead, it is hypothesized that an insufficient duration of azithromycin exposure and/or suboptimal azithromycin absorption in some patients may cause the clinical failures (11, 12). An extended azithromycin regimen, i.e. azithromycin 500 mg on the first day and 250 mg on the following 4 days, has been suggested as more or at least equally effective in eradicating M. genitalium and likely to mitigate the emergence of macrolide resistance in M. genitalium (1, 5–7, 13). In the European NGU and C. trachomatis management guidelines, this 5-day azithromycin regimen is recommended (2) or should be considered (3), respectively, when M. genitalium infection is verified or is suspected. Nevertheless, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the 5-day azithromycin regimen for treatment of M. genitalium infection have not been performed, and no data regarding the eradication rate of C. trachomatis have been published.

This study evaluated the eradication rate of C. trachomatis and M. genitalium with the 5-day azithromycin regimen in patients with dual uncomplicated urogenital infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At the Olafia STI Clinic, Oslo, Norway, among 3,790 patients positive for M. genitalium from 2010 to 2014, 390 (10.3%) had a dual infection with C. trachomatis. Most of these patients received doxycycline because of non-gonococcal urethritis or cervicitis, but 102 received azithromycin, 500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg on the following 4 days. All patients positive for M. genitalium are offered a test-of-cure (TOC) after 5 weeks. One patient treated after 36 weeks, and 16 patients who did not attend for TOC were excluded. Accordingly, 85 dually infected patients were included (Table I).

For nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) for C. trachomatis and M. genitalium, DNA was isolated from 200 µl of first void urine from males or vaginal ESwabs in Amies media using MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume kit (elution in 100 µl buffer) on a MagNA Pure 96 System (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). For detection of C. trachomatis, prior to January 2013, 25 µl of the DNA preparation were analysed with the COBAS TaqMan CT test v2.0 on a COBAS Taqman 48 (Roche Diagnostics). However, after December 2012, 10 µl of DNA was analysed using the GeneProof C. trachomatis PCR Kit (Geneproof, Brno, Czech Republic). DNA isolation and C. trachomatis NAATs were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions. For M. genitalium detection, 10 µl of isolated DNA were tested with a real-time PCR (reaction volume 25 µl) with previously described primers and probes (14), on a 7900HT instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

RESULTS

For the 54 females, the median age was 23.5 years (age range 18–47 years), and for the 31 males, median age was 26 years (age range 19–51 years), respectively. The delay from a positive test result to initiation of treatment varied from 4 days to 5 weeks, with a median time of one week in both females and males. The interval from initiation of treatment to TOC ranged from 4 to 43 weeks, with a median time of 6 weeks in both females and males.

The results of the TOCs and the interpretations of the positive TOCs are summarized in Table I. Thus, at TOC, 6 (7.1%) of the 85 patients were positive for C. trachomatis and 3 (50%) of these 6 patients were also positive for M. genitalium. Eighteen (21%) additional patients were positive for M. genitalium only. Of the 6 (7.1%) patients positive for C. trachomatis, 2 (2.4%) were considered to be probable re-infections, 3 (3.5%) as possible re-infections, and only 1 (1.2%) as a probable treatment failure. The latter was a female who had an infection with vomiting and fever during therapy. The 2 patients with probable C. trachomatis re-infections were again treated with the 5-day azithromycin treatment regimen and were negative for C. trachomatis at TOC (they remained positive for M. genitalium). One received azithromycin 1 g and was subsequently negative in TOC. The 2 remaining patients with possible C. trachomatis re-infections were treated with the recommended doxycycline regimen (3). The female with probable C. trachomatis treatment failure was negative for both C. trachomatis and M. genitalium at TOC after subsequent treatment with moxifloxacin, 400 mg daily for 7 days. Of the 21 (25%) patients positive for M. genitalium at TOC, 6 (7.1%) were considered as possible or probable re-infections and, accordingly, 15 (18%) of the initial 85 patients positive for M. genitalium were probable treatment failures (Table I).

Table I. Summary of 85 patients dually infected with C. trachomatis (CT) and M. genitalium (MG), treated with the 5-day azithromycin regimen and returning for test-of-cure (TOC), 2010–2014

Total, n

Males, n

Females, n

TOC performed

85

31

54

TOC negative for CT and MG

61

23

38

TOC positive for CT only

3

1

2

TOC positive for MG only

18

6

12

TOC positive for CT and MG

3

1

2

Among TOC positive cases:

Possible or probable CT re-infectiona

5

2

3

Possible or probable MG re-infectiona

6

2

4

Probable CT failureb

1

0

1

Probable MG treatment failureb

15

8

7

aIncluded 2 patients with probable re-infection for both CT and MG. bThe patient with a probable CT treatment failure was also considered as a probable MG treatment failure.

Overall, taking into account only the patients in whom re-infection could be excluded, the eradication rate for C. trachomatis and M. genitalium was 98.8% (79/80) and 81% (64/79), respectively.

DISCUSSION

This paper presents the first data revealing that the 5-day azithromycin treatment regimen used for M. genitalium in several countries also effectively eradicates C. trachomatis (eradication rate of uncomplicated urogenital infection: 98.8%). Only one probable treatment failure was identified and this patient had been vomiting and possibly not been able to absorb the azithromycin pills on the last days of treatment. The patient was treated successfully with 7-day moxifloxacin therapy. Worryingly, the eradication rate of M. genitalium was 81% (64/79), which probably reflects the high rates of pre-existing, endemic azithromycin resistance in the M. genitalium population circulating in Oslo, Norway. This treatment efficacy for M. genitalium was in line with a previous study reporting an eradication rate of 78% in Oslo (13). However, a much higher azithromycin failure rate has been reported from Australia (15). In general, it has been suggested that an extended course of bacteriostatic azithromycin is probably bactericidal to C. trachomatis, and in respiratory tract infections, azithromycin 1.5 g is administered over 3–5 days where it achieves therapeutic levels in target tissues for up to 10 days (11). Use of the 5-day azithromycin regimen when M. genitalium has been verified or is suspected might also mitigate the emergence of resistance in M. genitalium (1, 7, 11). A pragmatic extended azithromycin regimen could also be implemented, i.e. azithromycin, 1 g on the first day followed by 250 mg daily for 4 days, which includes the currently recommended azithromycin 1 g stat (immediate) dose (2–4, 8, 11).

Appropriate RCTs with extended azithromycin therapeutic regimens for both M. genitalium and C. trachomatis remain crucial. In such studies emergence of macrolide resistance in M. genitalium should be monitored, and TOC for both bacteria should be performed. Finally, new treatment options for M. genitalium infections are essential, and dual antimicrobial therapy, already introduced for gonorrhoea, might need to be considered.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Amir Moghaddam and Nils Reinton for performing the diagnostic testing.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Taylor-Robinson D, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium: from Chrysalis to multicolored butterfly. Clin Microbiol Rev 2011; 24: 498–514.

2. Shahmanesh M, Moi H, Lassau F, Janier M; IUSTI/WHO. European guideline on the management of male non-gonococcal urethritis. Int J STD AIDS 2009; 20: 458–464.

3. Lanjouw E, Ossewaarde JM, Stary A, Boag F, Van Der Meijden WI. 2010 European guideline for the management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Int J STD AIDS 2010; 21: 729–737.

4. Manhart LE, Gillespie CW, Lowens MS, Khosropour CM, Colombara DV, Golden MR, et al. Standard treatment regimens for nongonococcal urethritis have similar but declining cure rates: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56: 934–942.

5. Björnelius E, Anagrius C, Bojs G, Carlberg H, Johannisson G, Johansson E, et al. Antibiotic treatment of symptomatic Mycoplasma genitalium infection in Scandinavia: a controlled clinical trial. Sex Transm Infect 2008; 84: 72–76.

6. Salado-Rasmussen K, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium testing pattern and macrolide resistance: a Danish nationwide retrospective survey. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59: 24–30.

7. Anagrius C, Lore B, Jensen JS. Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium. Observations from a Swedish STD clinic. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e61481.

8. Schwebke JR, Rompalo A, Taylor S, Seña AC, Martin DH, Lopez LM, et al. Re-evaluating the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis: emphasizing emerging pathogens – a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: 163–170.

9. Handsfield HH. Questioning azithromycin for chlamydial infection. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38: 1028–1029.

10. Sena AC, Lensing S, Rompalo A, Taylor SN, Martin DH, Lopez LM, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis infections in men with nongonococcal urethritis: predictors and persistence after therapy. J Infect Dis 2012; 206: 357–365.

11. Horner PJ. Azithromycin antimicrobial resistance and genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: duration of therapy may be the key to improving efficacy. Sex Transm Infect 2012; 88: 154–156.

12. Bhengraj AR, Srivastava P, Mittal A. Lack of mutation in macrolide resistance genes in Chlamydia trachomatis clinical isolates with decreased susceptibility to azithromycin. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2011; 38: 178–179.

13. Jernberg E, Moghaddam A, Moi H. Azithromycin and moxifloxacin for microbiological cure of Mycoplasma genitalium infection: an open study. Int J STD AIDS 2008; 19: 676–679.

14. Jensen JS, Björnelius E, Dohn B, Lidbrink P. Use of TaqMan 5’ nuclease real-time PCR for quantitative detection of Mycoplasma genitalium DNA in males with and without urethritis who were attendees at a sexually transmitted disease clinic. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 683–692.

15. Bissessor M, Tabrizi SN, Twin J, Abdo H, Fairley CK, Chen MY, et al. Macrolide resistance and azithromycin failure in a Mycoplasma genitalium-infected cohort and response of azithromycin failures to alternative antibiotic regimens. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60: 1228–1236.