Content » Vol 96, Issue 6

Investigative Report

Serotonergic Markers in Atopic Dermatitis

Aram Rasul1, Husameldin El-Nour1, 5, Sol-Britt Lonne-Rahm1, Oscar Fransson1, Charlotta Johansson1, Björn Johansson2, Marwe Zubeidi1, Emma Seeberg1, Diana Radu Djurfeldt3, Efrain C. Azmitia4 and Klas Nordlind1

1Dermatology and Venereology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, 2Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, CMM, Department of Clinical Neuroscience and 3Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 4Department of Biology and Psychiatry, New York University, New York, NY, USA, and 5College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

 

Stress and anxiety may worsen atopic dermatitis (AD) through the serotonin system. Serotonergic expression was measured in 28 patients with AD in relation to extent of the disease (SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis; SCORAD), pruritus intensity (visual analogue scale; VAS), anxiety traits (Swedish Universities Scales of Personality; SSP) and depression (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self assessment; MADRS-S). Biopsies were taken from lesional and non-lesional AD skin, and investigated for expression of serotonin, its receptors 5-HT1A and 5-HT2AR, and serotonin transporter protein (SERT), using immunohistochemistry. 5-HT1AR-immunoreactivity (ir) was higher in lesional skin in apical epidermis and in mast cell-like cells in dermis, and the 5-HT2AR-ir was higher in apical epidermis and on blood vessels. In contrast, a basement membrane 5-HT2AR-ir signal was higher in non-lesional skin. The distribution of SERT-ir in the basal epidermal layer was higher in lesional skin. Positive and negative correlations were found between serotonergic markers and SCORAD, inflammation, pruritus intensity, anxiety traits, and depression score, indicating that serotonergic mechanisms are involved in AD. Key words: atopic dermatitis; inflammation; pruritus; serotonergic system.

Accepted Feb 1, 2016; Epub ahead of print Feb 2, 2016

Acta Derm Venereol 2016; XX: XX–XX.

Aram Rasul, Dermatology and Venereology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: aram.rasul@ki.se.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory, and often highly pruritic, disease with a dry skin. Global prevalence rates range from approximately 1% to 20% (1). AD is often clinically worsened by stress and anxiety (2–4) and a particular personality of these patients, being more prone to anxiety, has been postulated (5).

There is bilateral contact between the neuroendocrine system and the immune system, including the skin (6). While acute stress involves activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, autonomic nervous system, and neuropeptides, chronic stress has a more complex effect. Different mediators are responsible for this contact between the neuroendocrine system and the skin, an important mediator being serotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine; 5-HT).

5-HT has profound effects both at the central and peripheral levels of the neuroendocrine system and acts via different receptors. In humans it is mainly present in peripheral tissues, and platelets, while in other animals it is also found in mast cells (7). The major source of 5-HT is in the gut (enterochromaffin cells). The serotonin transporter protein (SERT) determines the magnitude and duration of the serotonergic response.

5-HT exerts its effects via at least 21 receptors (8), of which the best characterized are the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors (R) (9). These receptors, besides their involvement in anxiety and stress (10, 11) also have a role in inflammation. Thus, agonists to 5-HT1AR, buspirone (12) and spiperone (13) diminished contact allergy in rodents, while an antagonist to 5-HT2AR, ketanserin, has been reported to decrease contact allergy (14, 15). SERT is also involved in inflammation via different neuronal and non-neuronal pathways (16).

Patients with AD have been reported to have a high­er serum level of 5-HT compared with patients with psoriasis and normal healthy controls (17). In addition, tandospirone, a 5-HT1AR agonist, improved the clinical and psychiatric symptoms of AD (18, 19).

With the aim of initiating the study of serotonergic mechanisms in AD, we investigated the expression of the serotonergic markers, 5-HT, SERT and the receptors 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A, in skin biopsies from patients with AD, using immunohistochemistry. These patients were characterized regarding disease extent, degree of inflammation, pruritus intensity, personality traits with somatic trait anxiety and psychic trait anxiety, stress susceptibility and depression score, and we correlated these parameters with the expression of these key serotonergic markers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Twenty-eight patients with AD, 18 females and 10 males, mean age 29.5 years (range 19–48 years) were recruited. The patients did not receive systemic therapy.

SCORAD and pruritus intensity

The extent of the disease was determined using SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) (21). Pruritus intensity was determined using a visual analogue scale (VAS), linear 0–10.

Psychodemographic data

Somatic trait anxiety, psychic trait anxiety and stress susceptibility were evaluated using the Swedish Universities Scales of Personality (SSP) (22). Absolute values were calculated. For depression score Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self assessment (MADRS-S) (23) was used.

Processing of biopsy specimens and immunohistochemistry

Biopsies (3 mm thick) were taken from lesional (L) skin of the elbow, and non-lesional (NL) skin (lower back region). Lana’s fixative (4% formaldehyde containing 0.2% picric acid) was applied for 2 h at 4ºC. After fixation, biopsies were rinsed in 0.1 M Sörensen’s phosphate buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 10% sucrose for at least 24 h and then rapidly frozen. They were later cut into 14 µm thick sections.

Sections were then incubated with antibodies against the serotonergic markers (Appendix S11). Thereafter, incubation with biotin-labelled anti-rabbit (BA-1000) or anti-mouse (BA-2000) IgG (both diluted 1:200; Vector), followed by treatment with the fluorochrome Cy2-labelled streptavidin (PA42001, 1:2000; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), was performed.

Microscopy

Coded sections were evaluated by 2 observers, who recorded similar scores.

Hyperkeratosis, acanthosis and degree of cellular infiltration in the dermis were graded semiquantitatively, 0–3 (0 = normal appearance, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe). The degree of 5-HT immunoreactivity was determined semiquantitatively, 0–3 (0 = no signal, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate and 3 = strong) in the epidermis and inflammatory infiltrates, while the absolute number of 5-HT-positive platelets was determined. For 5-HT1AR the fraction of positive staining of the total thickness of epidermis was evaluated, 0 = 0%, 1 ≤ 25%, 2 ≤ 50% and 3 ≤ 75%. The absolute number of positive 5-HT1AR inflammatory mononuclear cells in the papillary dermis was determined. For 5-HT2AR the epidermal fraction expressing this receptor of the total thickness of epidermis was, similar to the 5-HT1A epidermal fraction, graded 0–3. The basement membrane staining intensity was graded 0 for no staining, and 1–3 for increased staining intensity, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate and 3 = strong staining. The number of vessels expressing 5-HT2AR in papillary dermis was graded 0–3 (0 < 40, 1 = 40–59, 2 = 60–79 and 3 ≥ 80 vessels per section). The absolute number of SERT-positive mononuclear cells was counted in the epidermis and papillary dermis, respectively. In addition, the SERT signal intensity of the basal epidermal layer was assessed 0–3, as 0 = minimal, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate and 3 = strong staining.

Statistical analysis

The χ2 test and/or Fisher’s exact test were used in non-dependent samples, and the Student’s t-test or non-parametric test was used for dependent samples. Correlations were determined using Pearson’s or Spearman’s test. Differences were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Clinical and psychodemographic data

The objective SCORAD was 42.3 ± 11.5 (mean ± SD) (range 21.2–65.5) and subjective SCORAD 51.6 ± 13.4 (range 26.2–73.5) (Table I). The pruritus intensity, using the VAS scale, was 5.2 ± 2.4 (range 0–10).

Somatic trait anxiety was 15.1 ± 4.3 (range 8–22), psychic trait anxiety 15.2 ± 3.8 (range 9–25), and stress susceptibility 16.3 ± 4.1 (range 7–24). The score for MADRS-S was 8.0 ± 6.5 (range 0–24).

Table I. Clinical and psychodemographic data for the patients with atopic dermatitis (AD)

Characteristics

 

Age, years, mean (range)

29.5 (19–48)

Sex, F:M, n

18:10

Objective SCORAD, mean ± SD (range)

42.3 ± 11.5 (21.2–65.0)

Pruritus (0–10 cm), mean ± SD (range)

5.2 ± 2.4 (0–10)

Somatic trait anxiety, mean ± SD (range)

15.1 ± 4.3 (8–22)

Psychic trait anxiety, mean ± SD (range)

15.2 ± 3.8 (9–25)

Stress susceptibility, mean ± SD (range)

16.3 ± 4.1(7–24)

MADRS-S, mean ± SD (range)

8.0 ± 6.5 (0–24)

SCORAD: SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis; MADRS-S: Montgomery– Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self assessment.

General histopathological findings

The degree of hyperkeratosis was higher (p < 0.001) in L, 1.9 ± 0.7, compared with NL, 1.2 ± 0.4, skin. The degree of acanthosis was 2.1 ± 0.8 in L and 0.6 ± 0.8 in NL skin, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). The degree of inflammation was higher (p < 0.001) in L, 2.4 ± 0.7, compared with 1.1 ± 0.8 in NL skin.

5-HT

The epidermal immunoreactivity for 5-HT was similar, 2.1 ± 0.4 in L and 2.0 ± 0.3 in NL skin (Fig. 1, showing L skin). 5-HT staining of the inflammatory infiltrate was 2.0 ± 0.6 in L and 1.8 ± 0.5 in NL skin. A higher (p < 0.001) number of 5-HT-positive platelets, 5.0 ± 2.3, was recorded in L skin, being 2.0 ± 0.8 in NL skin.

10532.png

Fig. 1. (a) Epidermal, inflammatory infiltrate, and platelets expressing 5-hydroxy-tryptamine (5-HT), in lesional atopic dermatitis (AD) skin. Arrow: positive inflammatory cell; arrowhead: positive platelet. Conglomerate of positive cells is seen (strong staining). (b) Control in the absence of the primary antibody. Scale bars: 20 µm.

5-HT1AR

A 5-HT1AR-positive epidermal fraction was observed in the apical part of the epidermis, more evident (p < 0.001) in the L, 1.1 ± 0.7, compared with NL, 0.3 ± 0.5, skin (Fig. 2, Fig. S1a1), and also with a higher signal intensity. There were also dermal inflammatory, mast cell-like, cells that expressed the 5-HT1AR, their number being higher (p < 0.001) in L, 31.9 ± 10.6, compared with NL skin, 17.5 ± 6.0 (Fig. S1b1).

10570.png

Fig. 2. Epidermal and dermal inflammatory cellular 5-HT1AR expression, in (a) lesional and (b) non-lesional atopic dermatitis (AD) skin. Arrowheads: positive fraction of the epidermis (higher in a than in b); arrows: positive inflammatory dermal cell. Scale bars: 20 µm.

5-HT2AR

There was a difference (p < 0.05) in the epidermal fraction expressing 5-HT2AR in L compared with NL skin, reaching mean 1.8 ± 0.7 in L and 1.3 ± 1.1 in NL skin (Fig. 3, Fig. S1c1). There was a more evident (p < 0.001) basement membrane signal in NL, 2.3 ± 0.7, compared with L skin, 1.6 ± 0.6. The number of 5-HT2AR immunoreactive vessels in papillary dermis was increased (p < 0.001) from NL, 0.8 ± 0.7, to L, 2.3 ± 0.8, skin (Fig. S1d1).

10607.png

Fig. 3. Epidermal, basement membrane and vessel 5-HT2AR expression, in (a) lesional and (b) non-lesional atopic dermatitis (AD) skin. Arrowheads: positive apical epidermal fraction (higher in a than in b). Small arrow: staining intensity of basement membrane (strong in b, absent in a); (ordinary) arrows: positive vessels. Scale bars: 20 µm.

SERT

There was a higher number (p < 0.05) of epidermal SERT-positive cells, in L, 20.4 ± 12.0, compared with NL, 13.8 ± 5.7, skin (Fig. 4). The dermal SERT-positive cells were 39.9 ± 9.2 and 20.3 ± 4.5 in L and NL skin, respectively, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). There was a significantly higher (p < 0.001) degree of SERT immunoreactivity in the basal layer of L skin, 1.6 ± 0.6, compared with NL skin, 0.5 ± 0.5 (Fig. S1e1).

10639.png

Fig. 4. Serotonin transporter protein (SERT) expression of epidermal and dermal inflammatory cells and in the basal epidermal layer, in (a) lesional and (b) non-lesional atopic dermatitis (AD) skin. Arrows: positive inflammatory cells in the epidermis and dermis; arrowheads: basal epidermal expression intensity, being higher (moderate) in a than in b (slight). Scale bars: 20 µm.

Correlations

No correlation was found for extent of the disease and the psychodemographic data. The intensity of pruritus correlated positively with somatic trait anxiety (r = 0.50; p = 0.01) and stress susceptibility (r = 0.44; p < 0.05), respectively. No correlation was found between the serotonergic markers and the intensity of pruritus.

In L skin there was a positive correlation (r = 0.38; p < 0.05) between the number of 5-HT1AR-positive inflammatory dermal mast cell-like cells and objective SCORAD. There was also a positive correlation between the degree of acanthosis, and 5-HT positive inflammatory infiltrate, the number of 5-HT1AR positive mast cell-like cells, 5-HT2AR-positive vessels and the degree of basal epidermal SERT immunoreactivity. Moreover, there was a positive correlation (r = 0.39; p = 0.05) between the epidermal 5-HT1AR fraction with the MADRS-S score and an inverse correlation (r = –0.48; p < 0.05) between the 5-HT2AR-positive vessels and the same MADRS-S score. There was an inverse correlation (r = –0.42; p < 0.05) for the degree of basal epidermal SERT immunoreactivity with stress susceptibility and a tendency (r = –0.36; p = 0.07) to an inverse correlation with psychic trait anxiety.

In NL skin the degree of acanthosis correlated positively with objective SCORAD (r = 0.56; p < 0.01). In addition, a positive correlation between the 5-HT2AR-positive vessels, the objective (r = 0.38; p = 0.05) and subjective (r = 0.39; p < 0.05) SCORAD, as well as degree of acanthosis (r = 0.37; p = 0.05), was determined.

DISCUSSION

This study found correlation between the expression of serotonergic markers and the extent of AD, as well as correlation between these markers and the inflammatory histopathological measures of AD. In addition, these markers also correlated with the depression score and the stress susceptibility.

A 5-HT1AR-positive expression was detected in the apical part of the epidermis, which was more evident in L than NL skin, indicating that this receptor has a role in keratinocyte differentiation. There were also 5-HT1AR-positive mast cell-like cells, their number being higher in L than NL skin, and these might have an impact on the inflammatory process. There was a positive correlation between the number of these 5-HT1AR-positive cells and objective SCORAD. Our earlier studies on contact eczema (25) and psoriasis (26) found a lower number of 5-HT1AR-positive dermal cells in L than NL skin.

There was a higher epidermal fraction expressing the 5-HT2AR in L than NL skin. Moreover, the number of 5-HT2AR-positive vessels in papillary dermis was increased from NL to L skin. There was a correlation between 5-HT2AR-positive vessels in L skin and the degree of acanthosis. In addition, there was a positive correlation between the number of 5-HT2AR-positive vessels in NL skin and the objective and subjective SCORAD, respectively. The finding of such positive vessels might be due to a general importance of vessels for the inflammatory process, but a more specific role of the 5-HT2AR expressed on the vessels cannot be excluded.

In L skin there was an inverse correlation for the 5-HT2AR immunoreactive vessels with the depression score. This might indicate a protective role for this receptor regarding low mood, which is a somewhat unexpected finding. In this context it should be mentioned that an anti-inflammatory effect of 5-HT2AR has been reported earlier in rheumatoid arthritis (27). At the same time there was a positive correlation between 5-HT1AR epidermal expression in L skin and the depression score. Both these receptor expression changes might be due to compensatory mechanisms.

There was a higher degree of SERT immunoreactivity in the basal layer of L compared with NL skin, which indicates that keratinocyte proliferation might be affected by modulating this protein. In L skin there was an inverse correlation of this degree of SERT immunoreactivity with stress susceptibility and a tendency to an inverse correlation with psychic trait anxiety. At the same time a correlation was evident for the degree of SERT immunoreactivity and the degree of acanthosis and a tendency to a correlation with inflammation. This highlights the importance of SERT in the inflammatory process and suggests this protein as a therapeutic target for AD. In addition, SERT may have a protective role in stress susceptibility and psychic trait anxiety in AD.

We recorded a positive correlation for pruritus intensity, pruritus being a primary and critical symptom in AD, with stress susceptibility and somatic trait anxiety. However, we did not observe a correlation between eczema severity (SCORAD) and any of the investigated psychodemographic data. Oh et al. (28) reported that pruritus in patients with AD correlated with state anxiety and trait anxiety, while the SCORAD did not show correlation with psychological parameters. Their patients included both males and females, as was the case in our study. This may have an impact on the results. There are sex differences regarding anxiety and stress susceptibility (29). Furthermore, extended studies, which incorporate sex aspects, are warranted.

Furthermore, no correlation was found between pruritus intensity and serotonergic markers in our patients. 5-HT has a pruritogenic role in both AD patient and control skin (e.g. 30). In our previous investigation (31) there were no correlations between clinical findings (i.e. eczema severity, clinical pruritus) and recorded experimental itch, or flare or wheal responses for 5-HT, in the patients with AD. Thus, 5-HT does not seem to be a major pruritogen in AD.

In conclusion, a role for the serotonergic system seems to exist in AD. This is based on the fact that there is a differential expression of 5-HT and its receptors, 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A, and its transporter protein in L compared with NL skin, and in addition, a correlation with the serotonergic markers and extent of the disease as well as with routine inflammatory histopathological parameters. Moreover, there is a positive/inverse correlation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor expression and depression score, and an inverse correlation of degree of SERT immunoreactivity and stress susceptibility. After further studies these serotonergic molecules may become targets in the treatment of AD.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Anna-Lena Kastman for technical assistance and Robert A. Harris for linguistic advice. Dr Aram Rasul was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education in Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), Iraq.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

10485.png

1http://www.medicaljournals.se/acta/content/?doi=10.2340/00015555-2354

 

REFERENCES

 

1. DaVeiga SP. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis: a review. Allergy Asthma Proc 2012; 33: 227–234.

2. King RM, Wilson GV. Use of a diary technique to investigate psychosomatic relations in atopic dermatitis. J Psychosom Res 1991; 35: 697–706.

3. Suarez AL, Feramisco JD, Koo J, Steinhoff M. Psychoneuroimmunology of psychological stress and atopic dermatitis: pathophysiologic and therapeutic updates. Acta Derm Venereol 2012; 92: 7–15.

4. Takaki H, Ishii Y. Sense of coherence, depression, and anger among adults with atopic dermatitis. Psychol Health Med 2013; 18: 725–734.

5. Buske-Kirschbaum A, Ebrecht M, Kern S, Gierens A, Hellhammer DH. Personality characteristics in chronic and non-chronic allergic conditions. Brain Behav Immun 2008; 22: 762–768.

6. Zachariae R. Psychoneuroimmunology: a bio-psycho-social approach to health and disease. Scand J Psychol 2009; 50: 645–651.

7. Fröberg GK, Lindberg R, Ritter M, Nordlind K. Expression of serotonin and its 5-HT1A receptor in canine cutaneous mast cell tumours. J Comp Pathol 2009; 141: 89–97.

8. Bockaert J, Claeysen S, Bécamel C, Dumuis A, Marin P. Neuronal 5-HT metabotropic receptors: fine-tuning of their structure, signaling, and roles in synaptic modulation. Cell Tissue Res 2006; 326: 553–572.

9. Azmitia EC. Modern views on an ancient chemical: Serotonin effects on cell proliferation, maturation, and apoptosis. Brain Res Bull 2001; 56: 413–424.

10. Akimova E, Lanzenberger R, Kasper S. The serotonin-1A receptor in anxiety disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 66: 627–635.

11. Ossowska G, Nowak G, Kata R, Klenk-Majewska B, Danilczuk Z, Zebrowska-Lupina I. Brain monoamine receptors in a chronic unpredictable stress model in rats. J Neural Transm 2001; 108: 311–319.

12. McAloon MH, ChandraSekar A, Lin YJ, Hwang GC, Sharpe RJ. Buspirone inhibits contact hypersensitivity in the mouse. Inl Archs Allergy Immunol 1995; 107: 437–438.

13. Sharpe RJ, Chandrasekar A, Arndt KA, Wang ZS, Galli SJ. Inhibition of cutaneous contact hypersensitivity in the mouse with systemic or topical spiperone: topical application of spiperone produces local immunosuppression without inducing systemic neuroleptic effects. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 99: 594–600.

14. Ameisen JC, Meade R, Askenase PW. A new interpretation of the involvement of serotonin in delayed-type hypersensitivity. Serotonin-2 receptor antagonists inhibit contact sensitivity by an effect on T cells. J Immunol 1989; 142: 3171–3179.

15. Bondesson L, Nordlind K, Mutt V, Lidén S. Inhibitory effect of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and ketanserin on established allergic contact dermatitis in man. Acta Derm Venereol 1996; 76: 102–106.

16. Kroeze Y, Zhou H, Homberg JR. The genetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Pharmacol Ther 2012; 136: 375–400.

17. Soga F, Katoh N, Inoue T, Kishimoto S. Serotonin activates human monocytes and prevents apoptosis. J Invest Dermatol 2007; 127: 1947–1955.

18. Hashizume H, Takigawa M. Anxiety in allergy and atopic dermatitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 6: 335–339.

19. Kawana S, Kato Y, Omi T. Efficacy of a 5-HT1a receptor agonist in atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2010; 35: 835–840.

20. Williams HC, Burney PG, Pembroke AC, Hay RJ. The U.K. Working Party’s Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis. III. Independent hospital validation. Br J Dermatol 1994; 131: 406–416.

21. Schram ME, Spuls PI, Leeflang MM, Lindeboom R, Bos JD, Schmitt J. EASI, (objective) SCORAD and POEM for atopic eczema: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference. Allergy 2012; 67: 99–106.

22. Gustavsson JP, Bergman H, Edman G, Ekselius L, von Knorring L, Linder J. Swedish universities Scales of Personality (SSP): construction, internal consistency and normative data. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000; 102: 217–225.

23. Svanborg P, Asberg M. A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). J Affect Disord 2001; 64: 203–216.

24. Azmitia EC, Yu I, Akbari HM, Kheck N, Whitaker-Azmitia PM, Marshak DR. Antipeptide antibodies against the 5-HT1A receptor. J Chem Neuroanat 1992; 5: 289–298.

25. El-Nour H, Lundeberg L, Abdel-Magid N, Lonne-Rahm SB, Azmitia EC, Nordlind K. Serotonergic mechanisms in human allergic contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 2007; 87: 390–396.

26. Nordlind K, Thorslund K, Lonne-Rahm S, Mohabbati S, Berki T, Morales M, et al. Expression of serotonergic receptors in psoriatic skin. Arch Dermatol Res 2006; 298: 99–106.

27. Yu B, Becnel J, Zerfaoui M, Rohatgi R, Boulares AH, Nichols CD. Serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine(2A) receptor activation suppresses tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced inflammation with extraordinary potency. J Pharmacol Exper Ther 2008; 327: 316–323.

28. Oh SH, Bae BG, Park CO, Noh JY, Park IH, Wu WH, et al. Association of stress with symptoms of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 2010; 90: 582–588.

29. Sachs BD, Ni JR, Caron MG. Sex differences in response to chronic mild stress and congenital serotonin deficiency. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014; 40: 123–129.

30. Rasul A, Nordlind K, Wahlgren C-F. Pruritic and vascular responses induced by serotonin in patients with atopic dermatitis and in healthy controls. Acta Derm Venereol 2013; 93: 277–280.

Supplementary content
Appendix S1
Figure S1