Content » Preview

Short communication

Effect of Topical Rapamycin 1% on Multiple Trichoepitheliomas

Isabelle Dreyfus1, Giuliana Onnis1, Emilie Tournier2, Olivier Dereure3 and Juliette Mazereeuw-Hautier1

1Reference Centre for Rare Skin Diseases, (CRMRP), Dermatology Department, CHU Larrey, 24, Chemin de Pouvourville, FR-31400 Toulouse Cedex 09, 2Laboratory of Pathological Anatomy and Cytology, CHU Oncopole, Toulouse, and 3Dermatology of Department and INSERM U1058 University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. E-mail: dreyfus.i@chu-toulouse.fr

Accepted Jan 15, 2019; E-published Jan 17, 2019

INTRODUCTION

Trichoepitheliomas are benign adnexal neoplasms with follicular differentiation that can occur as isolated sporadic lesions or as part of multiple familial trichoepitheliomas (MFT) syndrome, a phenotypic variant of Brooke-Spiegler syndrome associated with autosomal dominant mutations of the tumour suppressor gene CYLD (16q12.1) (1, 2). In the MFT setting, trichoepitheliomas appear during childhood as multiple skin-coloured papules or small nodules, usually present with a symmetrical distribution and localized on the scalp, neck and face (with predominance on the nose, cheeks, forehead, nasolabial folds and inner aspects of the eyebrows). Trichoepitheliomas progressively increase in number and size over years and usually result in significant aesthetic disfiguring. Brinkhuizen et al. (3) recently demonstrated that, similarly to tuberous sclerosis (4), the pathogenesis of trichoepitheliomas involves an activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling pathway. We report here the effect of topical rapamycin 1%, an efficient topical treatment of cutaneous angiofibroma, in patients with tuberous sclerosis, on trichoepitheliomas of 5 patients with MFT.

CASE REPORTS

The patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table SI. All trichoepitheliomas were histologically confirmed, showing basaloid lobules with keratocysts and infundibular keratinization without epidermal continuity, and with cellular fibroblastic stroma (Fig. 1). All patients were female, with a median age of 45 years (range 26–54 years). Lesions first appeared at the median age of 15 years (range 4–23 years) and were located exclusively on the face (front, nose, nasolabial folds). The number of lesions was between 20 and 500, and their diameter ranged from 2 to 5 mm. Molecular analysis was conducted in one patient showing a heterozygous mutation on exon 19 of the CYLD gene: c.2625dupT (p.Val876Cysfs*14). All patients had received prior topical and/or systemic treatments, including CO2 laser vaporization, 5% imiquimod cream and oral acitretin (maximum daily dosage 30 mg (0.5 mg/kg/day)).

 


Fig. 1. Trichoepithelioma (patient 2). Basaloid lobules showing keratocysts and infundibular keratinization (arrow) without epidermal continuity, and with cellular fibroblastic stroma. Haematoxylin-eosin stain, magnification ×50.

All patients were treated twice daily with a topical formulation of rapamycin 1%, in an emollient cream containing glycerol 15%/petroleum jelly 8%/liquid paraffin 2%. None of the patients used concomitant treatments. Efficacy and tolerance were evaluated after 2 months (M2, intermediate evaluation) and 5 months (M5, final evaluation) of uninterrupted treatment, using a visual analogical scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. Efficacy was rated by 2 different physicians, either during the visits or blindly through digital photograph analysis, and by the patients. According to the physicians’ rating, the median efficacy was 1/10 (range 0–3) at M2, and 3.5/10 (range 0–5) at M5. The clinical response was characterized by a decrease in the density of the lesions, related to a decrease in thickness and size of the lesions, rather than to a reduction in the number of lesions (Fig. 2). According to the patients’ rating, the median efficacy was 6/10 (range 0–6) at M2, and 5.5/10 (range 0–6) at M5. Four patients reported an improvement in the lesions and no new lesions under treatment. Conversely, patient 5 did not report any improvement.

Tolerance was considered good by all patients, self-rated at a median score of 9/10 (range 7–10) at M2 and 10/10 (range 4–10) at M5. Four out of 5 patients reported a slight irritation of the skin within the first week of treatment. Two patients reported an increased frequency of headaches during treatment, responding to paracetamol or triptans. None stopped the treatment because of side-effects. Among the 4 patients who had an improvement in their trichoepitheliomas, 2 are currently under treatment (patients 2 and 4). Patient 3 stopped the treatment and was then treated with CO2 laser. Ten months after stopping topical rapamycin, patient 1 has new lesions, but the size of treated lesions did not change.


Fig. 2. Multiple trichoepitheliomas localized on (a) nasolabial folds (patient 4), (b) forehead (patient 1) and (c) ala of the nose (patient 3). Evaluation before the start of rapamycin (left), and 5 months of treatment (right).

DISCUSSION

A number of therapeutic options have been proposed previously in MFT-related trichoepitheliomas, including surgery, dermabrasion, ablative CO2 laser and cryo-therapy. However, these invasive procedures have a limited efficacy and may be complicated by permanent scarring, hypopigmentation and atrophy. There is also a high risk of relapse (5, 6). Topical imiquimod also proved effective in 2 patients with solitary desmoplastic trichoepithelioma but the lesions relapsed after treatment discontinuation (7). More recently, the effect of topical mTOR inhibitors on MFT-related skin lesions was reported by Tu & Teng (2) in 2 siblings aged 6 and 8 years. A formulation of 1% rapamycin cream was applied on numerous, but small (2–4 mm), facial trichoepitheliomas, twice daily, alone or after ablative CO2 laser therapy, for a period of 7 and 12 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated and resulted in an interruption of the progression of the lesions, according to the authors. However, no evaluation score was provided. In line with this report, our results suggest that a topical formulation of rapamycin may reduce the thickness and size of trichoepitheliomas and reduce the occurrence of new tumours. However, the overall effect remains limited. This may be explained by incomplete penetration related to galenic formulation or by significant tumour thickness. Efficacy might therefore be optimized by occlusion, adjunction of a solubilizer agent in the formulation to increase rapamycin bioavailability, use of a more concentrated formulation, or concomitant use of ablative laser to reduce lesions thickness as in the report by Tu & Teng (2). Another reason for the limited efficacy could be that less than one-third of the trichoepitheliomas showed positive staining for mTOR (3). The limited efficacy might also be explained by the fact that other pathways, such as the hedgehog, might play a more relevant role in the pathogenesis of trichoepitheliomas than the m-Tor pathway (8). Baur et al. (8) recently showed a significant regression of the highly differentiated TE upon vismodegib, that could be explained by the upregulation of Gli1 (glioma-associated oncogene) mRNA in these tumours, indirectly upregulated by CYLD mutation. Contrasting with the limited clinical impact reported by the physicians, patients self-reported a higher efficacy that may reflect their high level of request for an effective therapy for these disfiguring lesions. Tolerance appears good overall. The occurrence of headaches, a side-effect reported for oral sirolimus may suggest a systemic diffusion of the drug (9). It is notable that this side-effect was not previously reported with the topical formulation, either in tuberous sclerosis (10) or in MFT-related trichoepitheliomas (2).

In conclusion, topical rapamycin, although off-label and expensive, may be considered in MFT-related facial trichoepitheliomas. Concomitant therapy, such as prior ablative laser, may be considered in order to optimize the efficacy of the drug.

REFERENCES
  1. du Toit JP, Schneider JW, Visser WI, Jordaan HF. The clinicopathological spectrum of trichoepitheliomas: a retrospective descriptive study. Int J Dermatol 2016; 55: 270–277.
    View article    Google Scholar
  2. Tu JH, Teng JM. Use of topical sirolimus in the management of multiple familial trichoepitheliomas. Dermatol Ther 2017; 30.
    View article    Google Scholar
  3. Brinkhuizen T, Weijzen CA, Thissen MR, van Marion AM, Lohman BG, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of the mechanistic target of rapamycin and hypoxia signalling pathways in basal cell carcinoma and trichoepithelioma. PLoS One 2014; 9: e106427.
    View article    Google Scholar
  4. Amin S, Lux A, Khan A, O’Callaghan F. Sirolimus ointment for facial angiofibromas in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex. Int Sch Res Notices 2017; 2017:8404378.
    View article    Google Scholar
  5. Hofmann L, Kraus SL, Brauns B, Schön MP, Kretschmer L. Complex surgical therapy of multiple trichoepitheliomas J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2015; 13: 457–459.
    View article    Google Scholar
  6. Sinha K, Mallipeddi R, Sheth N, Al-Niaimi F. Carbon dioxide laser ablation for trichoepitheliomas: The largest reported series. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2018; 20: 9–11.
    View article    Google Scholar
  7. Seo SH, Kim GW, Sung HW. Imiquimod as an adjuvant treatment measure for desmoplastic trichoepithelioma. Ann Dermatol 2011; 23: 229–231.
    View article    Google Scholar
  8. Baur V, Papadopoulos T, Kazakov DV, Agaimy A, Hartmann A, Isbary G, et al. A case of multiple familial trichoepitheliomas responding to treatment with the Hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor vismodegib. Virchows Arch 2018; 473: 241–246.
    View article    Google Scholar
  9. Nocera A, Andorno E, Tagliamacco A, Morelli N, Bottino G, Ravazzoni F, et al. Sirolimus therapy in liver transplant patients: an initial experience at a single center. Transplant Proc 2008; 40: 1950–1952.
    View article    Google Scholar
  10. Wang S, Liu Y, Wei J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Xu Z. Tuberous sclerosis complex in 29 children: clinical and genetic analysis and facial angiofibroma responses to topical sirolimus. Pediatr Dermatol 2017; 34: 572–577.
    View article    Google Scholar
Supplementary content
Table SI