Content » Vol 100, June

Short communication

Infantile Lipofibromatosis-like Neural Tumour Investigated by a Fusion Gene Detection Assay

Hiromi Higaki-Mori1, Masanori Hisaoka2, Yuichi Yoshida1, Yuko Ehara1, Masahisa Shindo3 and Osamu Yamamoto1

1Department of Medicine of Sensory and Motor Organs, Division of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 86 Nishi-Cho, Yonago, Tottori 683-8503, 2Department of Pathology and Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, and 3Division of Dermatology, National Hospital Organization Hamada Medical Center, Japan. E-mail: higaki.h@tottori-u.ac.jp

Accepted May 26, 2020; Epub ahead of print Jun 3, 2020

Acta Derm Venereol 2020; 100: adv00180

INTRODUCTION

Lipofibromatosis-like neural tumour is rare soft-tissue tumour, first described by Agaram et al. in 2016 (1). The tumour is composed of CD34-positive spindle cells with an infiltrative growth pattern similar to that of lipofibromatosis. The features that differentiate this tumour from lipofibromatosis are S-100 protein expression and positive neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 1 (NTRK1) gene rearrangement. The most common NTRK1 fusion partner is the Lamin A/C (LMNA) gene (1). We report here an infant case of lipofibromatosis-like neural tumour in which electron microscopic observation was performed for the first time.

CASE REPORT

A 6-month-old boy was referred to us for examination of a tumour on his left buttock. The lesion was first noted at 4 months of age. On physical examination, the tumour was firm, red and 3×4 cm in diameter (Fig. 1a). Histopathological examination revealed a poorly circumscribed tumour composed of spindle cells (Fig. 1b). The cells were arranged in a disorderly manner and had diffusely infiltrated the dermis and subcutaneous tissue with no necrosis or haemorrhage (Fig. 1c). The tumour cells showed only mild atypia, and mitotic figures were rarely seen. Ultrastructurally, the tumour cells had deeply convoluted nuclei and well-developed organelles, closely similar to those of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) (Fig. 1d). Immunohistochemically, the tumour cells were positive for CD34 and moderately positive for S-100 protein (Fig. 1e, f), but negative for α-smooth muscle actin (SMA), SOX10, CD68, Bcl-2, CD99, desmin, c-kit and neurofilament. Pan-tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) showed diffuse cytoplasmic positivity within spindle cells (Fig. 1g). The fraction of Ki-67-positive tumour cells was 11% (not shown). Reverse transcription (RT) PCR assay showed LMNA-NTRK1 fusion transcripts (Fig. 1h). The fusion transcript was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1i). On the other hand, RT-PCR assay for collagen type1α1 (COL1A1)/platelet-derived growth factor B-chain (PDGFB) fusion transcripts was negative (not shown). Based on these findings, we diagnosed the tumour as lipofibromatosis-like neural tumour. The lesion was excised with 1-cm margins. No evidence of recurrence or metastasis has been found for 15 months.


Fig. 1. (a) Clinical appearance of the tumour on the left buttock. (b) A poorly circumscribed lesion with an infiltrative growth pattern (haematoxylin-eosin (HE), original magnification × 10). (c) Proliferation of spindle cells arranged in a disorderly manner (HE, original magnification × 200). (d) Ultrastructural features. Tumour cells with highly lobulated nuclei (scale bar: 5 μm). (e) Strong to moderate diffuse cytoplasmic expression of CD34 (original magnification × 200). (f) Weak multifocal cytoplasmic expression of S-100 protein (original magnification × 200). (g) Moderate diffuse cytoplasmic expression of pan-TRK (original magnification × 100). (h) Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for detection of LMNA-NTRK1 fusion transcripts. M, molecular size marker; N, negative control (distilled water); L-N, LMNA-NTRK1 primer (282 bp); PBGD, porphobilinogen deaminase (127 bp); PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase (247 bp). (i) Confirmation of the fusion junction by Sanger sequencing.

DISCUSSION

Lipofibromatosis-like neural tumour mainly occurs on the trunk and extremities of children and young adults. The main differential diagnoses of the lesion include DFSP, infantile fibrosarcoma, low-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST), fibrous hamartoma of infancy and lipofibromatosis (Table I). DFSP rarely arises in children: patients younger than 16 years account for 6% of the tumours (2). DFSP is typically composed of CD34-positive and S-100 protein-negative spindle cells in a storiform pattern. However, early-stage DFSP, such as congenital case may lack typical pathological features (3). The COL1A1-PDGFB fusion transcript was detected in children, as well as in adults and helpful in the diagnosis (2). Infantile fibrosarcoma is composed of spindled cells arranged in fascicles or a herringbone pattern and often shows increased mitotic figures, haemorrhage and necrosis. Low-grade MPNST occurs mainly in adult patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 associated with plexiform neurofibroma. The tumour cells often express S-100 protein and SOX10. Fibrous hamartoma of infancy is histologically characterized by 3 components: α-SMA-positive fibroblastic area, loosely textured areas chiefly consisting of immature cells, and adipose tissue. Lipofibromatosis is locally aggressive soft tissue tumour with a predilection for infants and children. The tumour is composed of spindle tumour cells with a diffuse infiltrative growth pattern and an adipose component (4). It is difficult to distinguish lipofibromatosis from lipofibromatosis-like neural tumour histopathologically. Detection of LMNA-NTRK1 fusion transcripts and pan-TRK expression are useful to confirm a diagnosis.

Since a diagnosis of infantile soft tissue tumour is often difficult, careful assessment of clinical course, histopathological features, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis is needed. The lipofibromatosis-like histological pattern with a detection of the rearranged NTRK1 gene is especially important for the diagnosis of lipofibromatosis-like neural tumour. Recently, infantile soft tissue sarcomas with LMNA-NTRK1 fusion transcripts have been reported (5–8). NTRK1-assosciated mesenchymal tumours show a variety of histological subtypes (9, 10). The classification of those tumours is still controversial. Since lipofibromatosis-like neural tumour is considered to be a locally aggressive tumour (1, 11), careful follow-up is required.


Table I. Clinicopathological differential diagnoses of the present case

REFERENCES
  1. Agaram NP, Zhang L, Sung YS, Chen CL, Chung CT, Antonescu CR, et al. Recurrent NTRK1 gene fusions define a novel subset of locally aggressive lipofibromatosis-like neural tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2016; 40: 1407–1416.
    View article    Google Scholar
  2. Valdivielso-Ramos M, Hernanz JM. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in childhood. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2012; 103: 863–873.
    View article    Google Scholar
  3. Iwata Y, Kodera M, Usuda T, Murakami S, Hisaoka M, Arima M, et al. Case of congenital dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: change of clinical features and pathological findings over 10 years. J Dermatol 2013; 40: 943–944.
    View article    Google Scholar
  4. Fetsch JF, Miettinen M, Laskin WB, Michal M, Enzinger FM. A clinicopathologic study of 45 pediatric soft tissue tumors with an admixture of adipose tissue and fibroblastic elements, and a proposal for classification as lipofibromatosis. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24: 1491–1500.
    View article    Google Scholar
  5. Wong V, Pavlick D, Brennan T, Yelensky R, Crawford J, Ross JS, et al. Evaluation of a congenital infantile fibrosarcoma by comprehensive genomic profiling reveals an LMNA-NTRK1 gene fusion responsive to crizotinib. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108: djv307.
    View article    Google Scholar
  6. Haller F, Knopf J, Ackermann A, Bieg M, Kleinheinz K, Schlesner M, et al. Paediatric and adult soft tissue sarcomas with NTRK1 gene fusions: a subset of spindle cell sarcomas unified by a prominent myopericytic/haemangiopericytic pattern. J Pathol 2016; 238: 700–710.
    View article    Google Scholar
  7. Pavlick D, Schrock AB, Malicki D, Stephens PJ, Kuo DJ, Ahn H, et al. Identification of NTRK fusions in pediatric mesenchymal tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017; 64.
    View article    Google Scholar
  8. Bender J, Anderson B, Bloom DA, Rabah R, McDougall R, Vats P, et al. Refractory and metastatic infantile fibrosarcoma harboring LMNA-NTRK1 fusion shows complete and durable response to crizotinib. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 2019; 5: a003376.
    View article    Google Scholar
  9. Suurmeijer AJH, Dickson BC, Swanson D, Zhang L, Sung YS, Cotzia P, et al. A novel group of spindle cell tumors defined by S100 and CD34 co-expression shows recurrent fusions involving RAF1, BRAF, and NTRK1/2 genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2018; 57: 611–621.
    View article    Google Scholar
  10. Kohsaka S, Saito T, Akaike K, Suehara Y, Hayashi T, Takagi T, et al. Pediatric soft tissue tumor of the upper arm with LMNA-NTRK1 fusion. Hum Pathol 2018; 72: 167–173.
    View article    Google Scholar
  11. Lao IW, Sun M, Zhao M, Yu L, Wang J. Lipofibromatosis-like neural tumour: a clinicopathological study of ten additional cases of an emerging novel entity. Pathology 2018; 50: 519–523.
    View article    Google Scholar